Jump to content

Talk:Uniforms of the Confederate States Armed Forces: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Camouflage: new section
Line 33: Line 33:


Is the CS buckle with a mine ball in it on a recent episode of Pawn Stars a fake or not? [[User:Bizzybody|Bizzybody]] ([[User talk:Bizzybody|talk]]) 03:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Is the CS buckle with a mine ball in it on a recent episode of Pawn Stars a fake or not? [[User:Bizzybody|Bizzybody]] ([[User talk:Bizzybody|talk]]) 03:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

== Camouflage ==

"Grey was not the best choice for camouflage, although at the time the usefulness of camouflage was not generally recognized"

That being the case, what is the value of bringing it up, other than being a smarty-pants?--[[Special:Contributions/172.190.128.81|172.190.128.81]] ([[User talk:172.190.128.81|talk]]) 00:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:00, 4 August 2011

Good articleUniforms of the Confederate States Armed Forces has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 24, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 16, 2008.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States / American Civil War GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
American Civil War task force

Article naming

I saw this page get moved to Uniforms of the Confederate military to better comply with the naming policy, but I believe to should be Uniforms of the Confederate States military forces, or better yet the usage found in the CSA's constitution, in the OR's, or another such source. Any thoughts? Kresock (talk) 23:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Uniforms of the Confederate States military forces/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Note: Because the GA nomination was withdrawn, I am not placing a failed GA template on this page, as the article did not fail a GA review. I hope that my suggestions will be of use in future improvements to this article. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article could use a good copyedit and some sourcing. Many sections are unsourced, and there are writing problems evident throughout the article. A few examples will suffice for now:

The liberty rifles have done a lot of general research on this topic and can sourced as evidence for the presence of "uniformed appearance" in their "INTERPRETING RICHMOND DEPOT CLOTHING FROM A MATERIAL CULTURE PARADIGM" which has general lawton's report to congress mention the well uniformed natured of Confederate forces in Feburary 1865 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asetpath (talkcontribs) 18:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. "grey" and "gray" - should be consistent
  2. unnecessary capitalization of military ranks in the middle of sentences
  3. "their sworn enemies" - doesn't seem encyclopedic
  4. Periods should come before references, not before and after.
  5. The numbers for stripes are very confusing. If someone wears one stripe that is one-quarter inch long, "one 1/4 stripe" is easier to understand than "1 1/4 stripe", which seems to indicate a stripe on one and one-quarter inch.
  6. "They of different colors" - errors like this should be caught before a GA review
  7. "They of different colors red for artillery officers" - punctuation after "colors"?
  8. The description on the image page for the Confederate belt buckle needs to be updated.
  9. "not fit for the heat of the lower decks of a ship" - this doesn't seem to be covered in the reference
  10. "Then a Master, the same as the Lieutenant, except that they have no star." - not a sentence
  11. "a foul anchor" - what is this?
  12. The online references in the sources and notes sections are missing information. See Template:Cite web. The video reference should also be formatted with Template:Cite video, and more information is needed.
  13. "junior-officers" shouldn't be hyphenated

I'm going to stop there, as this should be sufficient to get a sense of what needs to be fixed. On top of this, there also seems to be a shortage of information. Many sections are very brief, so the article has very little detail. Although the lead section is supposed to be a summary of the article, little of what is mentioned in the lead is repeated later in the article (detail on these topics would be helpful, as they sound interesting and would make this more of an article and less of a list).

I am going to put this nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions and/or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Please note that this is not a comprehensive list of what needs to be done for GA status but rather an indication of the direction the article needs to go. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still in need of a copyedit and more detail. The list above was not a complete list of every problem with the article, but more to show what sorts of problems exist. I recommend adding to the information and then seeking an editor who has not worked on this article to perform a thorough copyedit. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review 2

Pawn stars belt buckle.

Is the CS buckle with a mine ball in it on a recent episode of Pawn Stars a fake or not? Bizzybody (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Camouflage

"Grey was not the best choice for camouflage, although at the time the usefulness of camouflage was not generally recognized"

That being the case, what is the value of bringing it up, other than being a smarty-pants?--172.190.128.81 (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]