User talk:Vensatry: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:Vensatry/Archive 3. |
→i know but i abused as im very angry: new section |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
There are too many people editing [[Thanjavur]] article - too many anon IPs and newbies. I had to keep a constant eye on the article's history if at all I plan to get it to a GA or an FA. Besides, as Thanjavur is of great historical importance, there is too much to be added. Hence, reviewers might expect a great deal at a GA or FA discussion. Editing Mayiladuthurai is comparatively peaceful. I do not wish to speculate on where I might like to get the article to. But let's see. And congrats on the good job you are doing by policing Thanjavur article. The problem with such articles is that you keep your eyes off for a week or two and you will find your edits difficult to spot. Maybe, sometime in the future, I might involve myself.-<font style="color:white;background:black;" size="font-weight:normal" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|The Enforcer]]</font><sub><font color="red" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|Office of the secret service]]</font></sub> 16:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC) |
There are too many people editing [[Thanjavur]] article - too many anon IPs and newbies. I had to keep a constant eye on the article's history if at all I plan to get it to a GA or an FA. Besides, as Thanjavur is of great historical importance, there is too much to be added. Hence, reviewers might expect a great deal at a GA or FA discussion. Editing Mayiladuthurai is comparatively peaceful. I do not wish to speculate on where I might like to get the article to. But let's see. And congrats on the good job you are doing by policing Thanjavur article. The problem with such articles is that you keep your eyes off for a week or two and you will find your edits difficult to spot. Maybe, sometime in the future, I might involve myself.-<font style="color:white;background:black;" size="font-weight:normal" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|The Enforcer]]</font><sub><font color="red" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|Office of the secret service]]</font></sub> 16:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== i know but i abused as im very angry == |
|||
shahid always reverts my edits instead of cleanup.he had expanded preity zinta article like empire state building and he do not want that priyanka chopra article to be expanded.he is a biased writer.when i added other sectiond like stage performance,in the media,humanitarian work along with notably refrence he revert its always.according to wiki,musicians have separate info box .when i added same box to priyanka he reverted my edits.also priyanka is writing her songs for album means she is also a songwriter but he edited again.that's why i got fired at him leading to my abuse.you shoul watch and expand this article. |
|||
Revision as of 17:00, 14 August 2011
Wiki Learning
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial on Wikipedia
- Editing a page
- How to develop good articles
- Creating your first article
- Article Wizard
- Manual of Style
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Invite to WikiConference India 2011
| Hi Vensatry,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
|---|
GA
I don't understand what you are saying. Could you please be more precise? Secret of success (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I have not made much significant contribution but just a couple of sections in one or two articles. If that is not enough, I have removed the template if that bothers you. Secret of success (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
User:sreekar akkineni
Hi. I think your statement of the ip being the sockpuppet of sreekar akkineni is true. Earlier, a user named Niranjaniyengar(who was a sock of sreekar akkineni) wrote on my talk page in a similar manner. If you can trace the ip used by them, it would be possible to block him. I also have a doubt if Mr. Kollyfan, famed for his discussion of the Enthiran gross has something to do with this. It would throw some light on this manner. Thanks! Secret of success (talk) 16:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Glad that you got my point. Actually Sreekarakkineni, Niranjaniyengar and this IP seems like the same person. Will file a case soon.--Commander (Ping Me) 17:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- So put in a sock puppet investigation to find out. BollyJeff || talk 17:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for being very kind with your word of praise :) morelMWilliam 11:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ya, thanks a lot! :) :) Secret of success (Talk) 12:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Can my name be included in the main contributors section of the ICTF page?? Secret of success (Talk) 12:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have included your name in the list. morelMWilliam 12:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Can my name be included in the main contributors section of the ICTF page?? Secret of success (Talk) 12:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
Just wanted to know why you have replaced a public domain image with a copyrighted one-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 03:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- No, I don't have any problems :-) But if you have a free image and a non-free one, it is better to prefer the free image for the infobox.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 17:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Re: Mayiladuthurai
There are too many people editing Thanjavur article - too many anon IPs and newbies. I had to keep a constant eye on the article's history if at all I plan to get it to a GA or an FA. Besides, as Thanjavur is of great historical importance, there is too much to be added. Hence, reviewers might expect a great deal at a GA or FA discussion. Editing Mayiladuthurai is comparatively peaceful. I do not wish to speculate on where I might like to get the article to. But let's see. And congrats on the good job you are doing by policing Thanjavur article. The problem with such articles is that you keep your eyes off for a week or two and you will find your edits difficult to spot. Maybe, sometime in the future, I might involve myself.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 16:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
i know but i abused as im very angry
shahid always reverts my edits instead of cleanup.he had expanded preity zinta article like empire state building and he do not want that priyanka chopra article to be expanded.he is a biased writer.when i added other sectiond like stage performance,in the media,humanitarian work along with notably refrence he revert its always.according to wiki,musicians have separate info box .when i added same box to priyanka he reverted my edits.also priyanka is writing her songs for album means she is also a songwriter but he edited again.that's why i got fired at him leading to my abuse.you shoul watch and expand this article.