Talk:Code Geass: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to Talk:Code Geass/Archive 2. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
'''I realized, that people keep saying that this takes place in the past, but has anyone realized, that the man who looks like lelouch has the Black Knights symbol on his cloak?''' <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ShikkokuRenya3700|ShikkokuRenya3700]] ([[User talk:ShikkokuRenya3700|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ShikkokuRenya3700|contribs]]) 15:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
'''I realized, that people keep saying that this takes place in the past, but has anyone realized, that the man who looks like lelouch has the Black Knights symbol on his cloak?''' <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ShikkokuRenya3700|ShikkokuRenya3700]] ([[User talk:ShikkokuRenya3700|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ShikkokuRenya3700|contribs]]) 15:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Akito being an OVA? == |
|||
In the article it is stated that the work in progress, titled Code Geass Gaiden: Bōkoku no Akito, is an Original Video Animation and not a tv series. I would like some sources to back this claim? |
|||
Revision as of 07:17, 20 August 2011
 | Anime and manga C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Review(s)
Dropping here:
Bad reference
I removed the following reference from Geass.
- {{citation|title=|journal=[[Newtype (magazine)|Newtype]] USA|volume=5|issue=9|pages=|date=November 2006}}
Vol 5, issue 9 would be dated September 2006 not November 2006. The page number(s) is/are also missing. – allen四names 16:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Now confirmed as the September 2006 issue per this link. – Allen4names 21:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I call for the merging of Code Geass: Nightmare of Nunnally into the main article for Code Geass. It is a spin off series of Code Geass that does not have substanial notability outside of the Code Geass franchise. Furthermore, other spin-offs of Code Geass do not have their own articles (such as Suzaku of the Counterattack and the video game), therefore, Nightmare of Nunnally should not have preferential standing to have its own article.
In addition, the organization of the existing article is very poor, consisting of a poorly written and overly extensive but inconsistent plot summary and character entries that are already present on the current collective character page for Code Geass characters. A22 (talk) 09:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
what the...?
i'm right in assuming all the issues suddenly popped up because the article was restored from a backup... right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.150.124 (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Not sure but meh i think all the problems are fixed so? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.64.233 (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Shikkoku no Renya confusion..?
I realized, that people keep saying that this takes place in the past, but has anyone realized, that the man who looks like lelouch has the Black Knights symbol on his cloak? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShikkokuRenya3700 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Akito being an OVA?
In the article it is stated that the work in progress, titled Code Geass Gaiden: Bōkoku no Akito, is an Original Video Animation and not a tv series. I would like some sources to back this claim?