User talk:Xeno: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:37, 29 August 2011

Notes:

I will usually reply where original comments occurred and add notifications if thought necessary.
You may email me regarding anything sensitive, private, or confidential.
I work for or provide services to the Wikimedia Foundation, but this is my personal account. Edits, statements, or other contributions made from this account are my own, and may not reflect the views of the Foundation.
Feel free to post a message or ask a question. Please be sure to [[wikilink]] appropriate subjects. Thanks for visiting!

Archives

2008 /02 /03 /04 /05 /06 /07 /08 /09 /10 /11 /12 2009 /01/02 /03/04 /05 /06 /07 /08 /09 /10 /11/12 2010 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2011 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2012–2013 A1 2014 A2 2015 A3 2016–2019 A4
2020– A5

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

This user would like to wish you a happy Hallowe'en.

This user tries to be their best.

No prob - happy to help. Cheers, –xeno^talk 20:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am very grateful to you for your prompt action.--Arshan.abbas (talk) 16:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the hardblock because it seems silly not to allow him to directly post unblock requests; you appear to have redone it. Could you explain? Ironholds (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, ignore me; my bad. Looks like my defaults for the unblock interface got messed with. Ironholds (talk) 19:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You had me worried for a moment =). As an FYI, Previous blocks have come along with all kinds of edit warring on the talk page - I did not think it would be appropriate to repeat that cycle. –xeno^talk 19:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, and if that happens I'm happy to reblock the talkpage, and for a longer period; the alternative is a situation in which a user is vicariously running unblock requests through the admin who hit him with the banhammer, which is all kinds of awkward. Ironholds (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the note. –xeno^talk 19:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TT is presently edit warring [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] to maintain a wildly inaccurate statement that constitutes a personal attack on my integrity as an administrator (cf. [7]). –xeno^talk 21:14, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note to self; do not unblock TreasuryTag's talkpage access ever again in the future. Ever. Ever. (No, Ironholds, not even if it seems like a good idea. No, it's not POSSIBLE to be that drunk, and I'm pretty sure that would require one live chicken and a rabbi anyway). Ironholds (talk) 07:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your granting of talk page access was not unreasonable. It is unfortunate that TreasuryTag took the opportunity to continue edit warring over his inaccurate statement while blocked. –xeno^talk 13:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 appreciate the headsup. :). Thanks for your valuable work.  [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 20:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 :No prob - happy to help. Cheers, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
+===Thanks for prompt action===
+I am very grateful to you for your prompt action.--[[User:Arshan.abbas|Arshan.abbas]] ([[User talk:Arshan.abbas|talk]]) 16:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 == TreasuryTag ==