Talk:Polish brothers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:07, 5 September 2011

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I personally found the article useful FWIW, but I'm not an expert on judging what meets the Wikipedia guidelines. In any event I would disagree with the suggestion for two individual entries. If the brothers merit an entry at all, it should probably be as is: "The Polish Brothers" because that how they have worked and how film publications refer to them. Bealevideo (talk) 03:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a lot of pov content, toned the language down a bit and did some wikifying. The article still needs a fair amount of work done. Beach drifter (talk) 03:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argument for 3 articles or restructuring

They aren't conjoined twins, so they do sometimes work separately from each other. The brothers are notable enough that we need to have 3 separate sections in this article on 1)their work as a team and 2)their work independent of each other. this would include a filmography that lists their actual screen credits (1 film as actors, others as a director/writer team, others separately). We could alternatively have 3 articles, one with this name, and the two others for their solo works (and solo personal lives). i dont think they date one woman between them at a time. ghits: "the polish brothers" 470. "mark polish" 839. "michael polish" 793.(mercurywoodrose)76.232.10.199 (talk) 04:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:05, 5 September 2011 edit 76.232.10.199 (talk) →Argument for 3 articles or restructuring ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:07, 5 September 2011 edit undo 76.232.10.199 (talk) →Argument for 3 articles or restructuring Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	==Argument for 3 articles or restructuring==		==Argument for 3 articles or restructuring==
	They aren't conjoined twins, so they do sometimes work separately from each other. The brothers are notable enough that we need to have 3 separate sections in this article on 1)their work as a team and 2)their work independent of each other. this would include a filmography that lists their actual screen credits (1 film as actors, others as a director/writer team, others separately). We could alternatively have 3 articles, one with this name, and the two others for their solo works (and solo personal lives). i dont think they date one woman between them at a time. ghits: "the polish brothers" 470. "mark polish" 839. "michael polish" ~~1000~~.(mercurywoodrose)[[Special:Contributions/76.232.10.199\|76.232.10.199]] ([[User talk:76.232.10.199\|talk]]) 04:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)		They aren't conjoined twins, so they do sometimes work separately from each other. The brothers are notable enough that we need to have 3 separate sections in this article on 1)their work as a team and 2)their work independent of each other. this would include a filmography that lists their actual screen credits (1 film as actors, others as a director/writer team, others separately). We could alternatively have 3 articles, one with this name, and the two others for their solo works (and solo personal lives). i dont think they date one woman between them at a time. ghits: "the polish brothers" 470. "mark polish" 839. "michael polish" 793.(mercurywoodrose)[[Special:Contributions/76.232.10.199\|76.232.10.199]] ([[User talk:76.232.10.199\|talk]]) 04:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)