Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Objectivism/Cross talk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Karbinski (talk | contribs)
Project scope RFC if you will - is Obejctivism (Ayn Rand) ready for GA status?
Line 31: Line 31:


Either way is fine. If someone eliminates the article, they better integrate all of it into the "Objectivist movement" article. [[User:byelf2007|byelf2007]] ([[User talk:byelf2007|talk]]) 02 September 2011
Either way is fine. If someone eliminates the article, they better integrate all of it into the "Objectivist movement" article. [[User:byelf2007|byelf2007]] ([[User talk:byelf2007|talk]]) 02 September 2011

=== Is [[Objectivism (Ayn Rand)]] ready for Good Article status? ===
{{crosstalk}}

I read the article (lol, how often do you read the article? and how often do you just check the version history?), and it reads pretty good to me. --[[User:Karbinski|Karbinski]] ([[User talk:Karbinski|talk]]) 21:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:35, 13 September 2011


Revisit Deletion of Theory of Value article

Talk:Objectivist theory of value Last time there was no consensus reached. --Karbinski (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion Page is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value (2nd nomination) -- Karbinski (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the fate of Thomas Stevens (politician)

This may be of interest to members of this project: Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject_United_States_presidential_elections#Thomas_Stevens. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there has been an article laying around at the title Neo-Objectivist. It was transwikied to Wiktionary in March 2010 and tagged as such, but nothing was ever done to delete it or redirect it to a more robust article. Recently Byelf2007 (talk · contribs) did some cleanup/expansion and started linking it from other articles to de-orphan it. However, it is still a stub at best, and it isn't clear to me that a separate article is needed for this subject. Thoughts on what to do with this article would be appreciated. Merge/redirect to another article (such as Objectivist movement? Delete as non-notable? Keep and expand with sources? --RL0919 (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Self-follow-up: I notice that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Objectivism (ism vs. ist) was held in May 2009 and resulted in a redirect to Objectivist movement. --RL0919 (talk) 21:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either way is fine. If someone eliminates the article, they better integrate all of it into the "Objectivist movement" article. byelf2007 (talk) 02 September 2011

Is Objectivism (Ayn Rand) ready for Good Article status?

I read the article (lol, how often do you read the article? and how often do you just check the version history?), and it reads pretty good to me. --Karbinski (talk) 21:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]