Talk:Exercise hypertension: Difference between revisions
WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) m updated wikiproject WPMED «Stub/Mid» |
→I: query |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPMED|class=Stub|importance=Mid}} |
{{WPMED|class=Stub|importance=Mid}} |
||
What does "exercising at 100 W" mean??? You ought to provide this information! |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/83.168.75.9|83.168.75.9]] ([[User talk:83.168.75.9|talk]]) 07:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==I== |
==I== |
||
I recently had a nuclear EKG stress test, where they did an EKG as I exercised and then took pictures of my heart. They also did blood pressure checks immediately after exercise. Should we add a paragraph that such a test exists? (I came out fine, thank you, just out of shape.) [[User:Simesa|Simesa]] 12:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC) |
I recently had a nuclear EKG stress test, where they did an EKG as I exercised and then took pictures of my heart. They also did blood pressure checks immediately after exercise. Should we add a paragraph that such a test exists? (I came out fine, thank you, just out of shape.) [[User:Simesa|Simesa]] 12:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:28, 17 September 2011
Medicine Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
What does "exercising at 100 W" mean??? You ought to provide this information! 83.168.75.9 (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
I
I recently had a nuclear EKG stress test, where they did an EKG as I exercised and then took pictures of my heart. They also did blood pressure checks immediately after exercise. Should we add a paragraph that such a test exists? (I came out fine, thank you, just out of shape.) Simesa 12:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Really good stub, by the way. Simesa 12:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
The following four references are included here just so we'll have them in this article: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Simesa 12:21, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Exercise Hypertension (Question to Midgley)
Copied from Midgley's talk page Would be grateful if you could give this article the 'once-over' so we can hopefully take the 'not medically reviewed' tag off. Many Thanks Bob aka Linuxlad 14:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- It seems reasonable, but is beyond anything I really know about.Midgley 22:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks - at least it's not complete tosh medically :-) Linuxlad
References
I don't know what Journals those references are from. Perhaps the original author could more fully describe his or her references? J. Finkelstein 22:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
The Klaus reference was complete (but title & journal were reversed)- the Journal is just called 'Drugs' in the citations I've seen. The Johns Hopkins ref is American Journal of Hypertension. (as is found by following the link :-)) I've edited both - please check. Bob aka Linuxlad 09:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, it looks good!
But what link did you follow to find that?OOoohh, I see, the links on the talk page. Great work :) . J. Finkelstein 22:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)