:Yes, confirmed. They are also listed that way on the [http://www.doaj.org Directory of Open Access Journals]. A search for 'Pittsburgh' on the DOAJ site shows the publisher name as "'''University Library System, University of Pittsburgh'''". By the way, I support the creation of a new article. It seems odd for the parent organization to be described only in the article for one of its children. [[User:Barkchip|Barkchip]] ([[User talk:Barkchip|talk]]) 22:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
:Yes, confirmed. They are also listed that way on the [http://www.doaj.org Directory of Open Access Journals]. A search for 'Pittsburgh' on the DOAJ site shows the publisher name as "'''University Library System, University of Pittsburgh'''". By the way, I support the creation of a new article. It seems odd for the parent organization to be described only in the article for one of its children. [[User:Barkchip|Barkchip]] ([[User talk:Barkchip|talk]]) 22:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
I agree that "'''University Library System, University of Pittsburgh'''" is the best title. I think it makes sense to use the version that appears in their copyright statements and that it just reads more clearly that way. There was a lot of ULS specific information in the Hillman article, so it seemed sensible to group that together. I have more information on the ULS that I could include if we decide to split it off into a separate article.[[User:Billcarton|Billcarton]] ([[User talk:Billcarton|talk]]) 13:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Pittsburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject University of PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Split ULS section into its own article?
Anyone opposed to this idea? A question I do have is what should be the name of the ULS article, because "University Library System" is sort of a broad name for Wikipedia since it doesn't indicate that it is the University of Pittsburgh's. Possibilities:
University Library System
University of Pittsburgh Library System
University of Pittsburgh University Library System
University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh
University Library System (University of Pittsburgh)
I also have seen "University Library System, University of Pittsburgh" in databases such as Ulrich's for journals they publish. The publisher list on CrossRef lists them that way as well.Maripozapequena (talk) 19:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, confirmed. They are also listed that way on the Directory of Open Access Journals. A search for 'Pittsburgh' on the DOAJ site shows the publisher name as "University Library System, University of Pittsburgh". By the way, I support the creation of a new article. It seems odd for the parent organization to be described only in the article for one of its children. Barkchip (talk) 22:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that "University Library System, University of Pittsburgh" is the best title. I think it makes sense to use the version that appears in their copyright statements and that it just reads more clearly that way. There was a lot of ULS specific information in the Hillman article, so it seemed sensible to group that together. I have more information on the ULS that I could include if we decide to split it off into a separate article.Billcarton (talk) 13:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]