User talk:Bearian: Difference between revisions
→Italy censors Wikipedia: new section |
|||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
Wow, see [http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Comunicato_4_ottobre_2011/en this italian article]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian#top|talk]]) 00:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
Wow, see [http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Comunicato_4_ottobre_2011/en this italian article]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian#top|talk]]) 00:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
==WARNING== |
|||
:Are you just another jerk? Don't answer that. Stay away from me. |
|||
[[User:Calamitybrook|Calamitybrook]] ([[User talk:Calamitybrook|talk]]) 02:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:44, 6 October 2011
![]() | Bearian is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
![]() | IMPORTANT: If you have come here to ask me a legal question, please read Wikipedia's Legal Disclaimer first. No comment by me, on this page or anywhere else on this website, should be considered official legal advice; nor shall any communication between myself and any other person on this website constitute, or be held to create, a contractual or fiduciary relationship of any kind. |
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Archives
- Archived discussions
For older discussions on this User's talk page, see
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMarchToJune2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJulyToMidAugust2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateAugust2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesEarlySept2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateSept2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesEarlyOct2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateOct2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesNov2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesDec2007,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesEndJanFeb2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMarch2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAprilMay2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJune2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJuly2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAugSept2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOct2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesNov2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesDec2008,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesFebMar2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesApr2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMayJune2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJulyAug2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesSept2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOctNovDec2009,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesFeb2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMar2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAprMay2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJuneJuly2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAugSept2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOctNov2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesDec2010,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2011,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesFeb2011,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMarApr2011,
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMay2011, and
- User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJuneJulyAug2011.
- See also these two archives of RfAs from the first 11 days of each month:
New stuff
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
Which specifically of my deletions do you think were incorrect? I went through each one and checked the sources. This keeps coming up time and time and again (and in the AFD). To be included on that article, it's not enough that someone who was transgendered was murdered, they have to be murdered *because* they were transgendered. So which ones do you think I got wrong? --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
On your message on my talkpage, you mention that some of the additions were well-sourced, I don't dispute that it that the sources don't meet the criteria of the lede - read them and tell me which ones you think I'm wrong about and do meet the criteria set out in the lede. --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Trannie??? Maybe it's different where you are but that word is generally frowned upon when I'm from when describing transgendered people. --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's hyberbole for a purpose. Apologies for any hurt feelings. Now I have to go back to work. Bearian (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Vicki Vale (Kim Basinger): "But could we at least try to love each other?"
- Batman (Michael Keaton): "I'd like that. But he's out there – right now. And I've gotta go to work." from User:Ihardlythinkso.
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
Thanks
Thanks very much for the kind barnstarrage. JFW | T@lk 13:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there a reason in which I am not seeing as to why you full-protected Williamsville North High School? I mean, I see the media fallout after the latest suicide there, but I see no proof of a principal editing that article in violation of WP:COI. The user in question has not edited since 2007; see Special:Contributions/Patricia Neuterer. While I can understand semi-protection due to the media fallout ([1] and [2] was enough for me to justify that IMO), I think full-protection might be extreme at this point. –MuZemike 01:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- The question I have is was there any evidence of anyone trying to hide the edits or news of the suicides? I checked the history and found nothing that was removed or added about student suicides until yours. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 01:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK. I changed it to semi-protection for just six more hours from now. Bearian (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- After further complaints were made, I unprotected it. I'll still watch it for vandalism, but I shall have told you so. Bearian (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
Hi there. Given that you've withdrawn the AfD nomination, and that there's a pretty clear consensus to keep the article, how long does the discussion need to remain open? I'd much rather put my energy into the article itself, rather than swatting objections that have already been addressed as new people keep popping into the discussion. It's wearing me out. Waitak (talk) 22:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Looking forward to finishing up this sprint, and turn this article into something really worth having. Who knows, maybe one day it'll end up as a featured list. Stranger things have happened. Thanks again, and feel free to chime in on the article, if it's missing anything you're interested in. Waitak (talk) 19:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Request for advice
Hi,
I approached an admin about an AfD closure, and was told that the object of my request was "inconsequential", and that this justified him/her not responding to my question. The only previous contact I have had with this admin (ref), complete with initial differences, led, at least from my viewpoint, to a constructive and positive outcome. At this point I have agreed to stop trying to initiate a conversation on his/her user page.
I'm not mentioning the specifics here about the AfD, because I think I now have a new and different problem that needs dispute resolution. It is a problem that has a risk of becoming adversarial, but seems unfair to ignore. Were you to delve into the AfD issue, I think you would have sympathy to the long-term benefit to the encyclopedia. Regarding this new issue, I expect that you appreciate my interest in continuing cordial relationships, have experience in Wikipedia interactions, and have wisdom to know some things that I should not do. The minimum response that I am looking for is advice amongst the various paths of dispute resolution, or someone else who would be a good person to approach with the same question. Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 13:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Contested PROD
The proposed deletion of Gemmotherapy, which you seconded, has been contested. You may like to take it to AFD. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
As a participant of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginsberg's theorem, please comment at Talk:Ginsberg's theorem#RfC: Should this article be redirected to Wikiquote?. Goodvac (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Italy censors Wikipedia
Wow, see this italian article. Bearian (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
WARNING
- Are you just another jerk? Don't answer that. Stay away from me.