Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodsongs: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Stuartyeates (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Bloodsongs: Keep -- will try to find some better references |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 06:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 06:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I agree that this stub needs a lot of work, but with a rewrite and some additional links feel that this mag could pass the test (among its claims to fame is that it had an issue banned in Queensland. I'll see what I can do, but would welcome the input of others as I won't have time to do a thorough edit of this entry for a couple of weeks. [[User:Punkrocker1991|Punkrocker1991]] ([[User talk:Punkrocker1991|talk]]) 07:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:54, 9 October 2011
Bloodsongs
- Bloodsongs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability given Pesky (talk …stalk!) 11:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books) (which, by analogy, also applies to magazines) + WP:CONFLICT (the creator of the article was an editor of the magazine). HairyWombat 15:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I agree that this stub needs a lot of work, but with a rewrite and some additional links feel that this mag could pass the test (among its claims to fame is that it had an issue banned in Queensland. I'll see what I can do, but would welcome the input of others as I won't have time to do a thorough edit of this entry for a couple of weeks. Punkrocker1991 (talk) 07:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)