Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Barnett (video game designer): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Keep - rescue''' - A lot of the issues you mention are about the writing style and, therefore, can be fixed. The main issue for me here is notability - is Paul Barnett notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. A great deal of the sources used are problematic - they're either unreliable or are reliable but do not provide sufficient notability. It does seem that [http://www.criticalgamers.com/archives/gaming-news/warhammer_online_interview_at.php this] and [http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2009/02/13/warhammer-online-devs-talk-new-expansion-dabble-in-comedy-video/ this], however, are reliable enough and provide notability. I think that this article needs rescue (and I will tag as such), but not deletion. [[User:ItsZippy|ItsZippy]] <sup>([[User Talk:ItsZippy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ItsZippy|contributions]])</sup> 15:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Keep - rescue''' - A lot of the issues you mention are about the writing style and, therefore, can be fixed. The main issue for me here is notability - is Paul Barnett notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. A great deal of the sources used are problematic - they're either unreliable or are reliable but do not provide sufficient notability. It does seem that [http://www.criticalgamers.com/archives/gaming-news/warhammer_online_interview_at.php this] and [http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2009/02/13/warhammer-online-devs-talk-new-expansion-dabble-in-comedy-video/ this], however, are reliable enough and provide notability. I think that this article needs rescue (and I will tag as such), but not deletion. [[User:ItsZippy|ItsZippy]] <sup>([[User Talk:ItsZippy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ItsZippy|contributions]])</sup> 15:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete'''! I'm not sure, he's best known for Warhammer Online, however in less than a decade that will be forgotten along with Paul. Not "encyclopaedic" enough. |
* '''Delete'''! I'm not sure, he's best known for Warhammer Online, however in less than a decade that will be forgotten along with Paul. Not "encyclopaedic" enough. See [[Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_not_temporary]] [[User:TheEvery|TheEvery]] [[Special:Contributions/194.74.155.52|194.74.155.52]] ([[User talk:194.74.155.52|talk]]) 12:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 12:10, 13 October 2011
- Paul Barnett (video game designer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Multiple issues: Limited notability WP:GNG WP:NTEMP, Poorly sourced references WP:SOURCES WP:QS WP:DEADREF, CV like WP:COI, Poorly written, Random Trivia, lacks independence/autobiographical WP:COI. See Talk page for more details TheEvery (talk) 23:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - rescue - A lot of the issues you mention are about the writing style and, therefore, can be fixed. The main issue for me here is notability - is Paul Barnett notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. A great deal of the sources used are problematic - they're either unreliable or are reliable but do not provide sufficient notability. It does seem that this and this, however, are reliable enough and provide notability. I think that this article needs rescue (and I will tag as such), but not deletion. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 15:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete! I'm not sure, he's best known for Warhammer Online, however in less than a decade that will be forgotten along with Paul. Not "encyclopaedic" enough. See Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_not_temporary TheEvery 194.74.155.52 (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)