Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Ageism toward Adolescents, United States: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:11, 23 October 2011

Wikipedia:Ageism toward Adolescents, United States

Essay is largely redundant to WP:Ageism. The essay is written more like an article than anything else. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 01:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This essay should not be deleted, since (a) it is not redundant to WP:Ageism but expresses the opposite point of view, and (b) expresses a distinct point of view with a wealth of scholarly references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmales (talk • contribs) 03:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete blatant soapboxing and misuse of Wikipedia project space. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat: this essay, unlike the emotional, second-hand-sourced WP:Ageism that should be deleted, fits well within the standards of wiki essays, and is unusually carefully documented. Those asking for its deletion provide no scholarly reasons for doing so other than their own personal biases. I would be happy to respond to any specific challenge to this essay whem someone decides to provide one. Mmales (talk) 05:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:10, 23 October 2011 edit Mmales (talk \| contribs) 68 edits →‎Wikipedia:Ageism toward Adolescents, United States ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:11, 23 October 2011 edit undo Mmales (talk \| contribs) 68 edits →‎Wikipedia:Ageism toward Adolescents, United States Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*'''Delete''' blatant soapboxing and misuse of Wikipedia project space. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer\|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 04:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' blatant soapboxing and misuse of Wikipedia project space. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer\|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 04:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

	Repeat: this essay, unlike the emotional, second-hand sourced [[WP:Ageism]] that should be deleted, fits well within the standards of wiki essays, and is unusually carefully documented. Those asking for its deletion provide no scholarly reasons for doing so other than their own personal biases. I would be happy to respond to any specific challenge to this essay whem someone decides to provide one. [[User:Mmales\|Mmales]] ([[User talk:Mmales\|talk]]) 05:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)		Repeat: this essay, unlike the emotional, second-hand-sourced [[WP:Ageism]] that should be deleted, fits well within the standards of wiki essays, and is unusually carefully documented. Those asking for its deletion provide no scholarly reasons for doing so other than their own personal biases. I would be happy to respond to any specific challenge to this essay whem someone decides to provide one. [[User:Mmales\|Mmales]] ([[User talk:Mmales\|talk]]) 05:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)