Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brakeman (programming tool): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
HelloAnnyong (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Brakeman (programming tool). using TW |
Pmresource (talk | contribs) →Brakeman (programming tool): Delete vote. |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Brakeman (programming tool)}}) |
:({{Find sources|Brakeman (programming tool)}}) |
||
Non-notable product. As of this nomination, the sources given don't fulfill [[WP:N]]: the product's website, one presentation that was given at a conference, and two cursory events. There are no ''actual'' articles that fulfill the notability criteria, and I've not been able to find any that do. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 18:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
Non-notable product. As of this nomination, the sources given don't fulfill [[WP:N]]: the product's website, one presentation that was given at a conference, and two cursory events. There are no ''actual'' articles that fulfill the notability criteria, and I've not been able to find any that do. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 18:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': [[WP:NORUSH]] View One. ''...creating an article without establishing the basis of the content and its significance is a bad idea.'' Couldn't find any independent, reliable sources. The sources provided are [[WP:SPS|self-published]]. [[User:Pmresource|Pmresource]] ([[User talk:Pmresource|talk]]) 21:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:59, 29 October 2011
- Brakeman (programming tool) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product. As of this nomination, the sources given don't fulfill WP:N: the product's website, one presentation that was given at a conference, and two cursory events. There are no actual articles that fulfill the notability criteria, and I've not been able to find any that do. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:NORUSH View One. ...creating an article without establishing the basis of the content and its significance is a bad idea. Couldn't find any independent, reliable sources. The sources provided are self-published. Pmresource (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)