Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tummel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::'''Keep'''. I was only aware that Tummel was well known enough in Sweden to be regarded as notable, but Chiswick Chap has shown above that - in addition to this - the band also has an international reputation which I was not aware of. /[[User:FredrikT|FredrikT]] ([[User talk:FredrikT|talk]]) 21:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
::'''Keep'''. I was only aware that Tummel was well known enough in Sweden to be regarded as notable, but Chiswick Chap has shown above that - in addition to this - the band also has an international reputation which I was not aware of. /[[User:FredrikT|FredrikT]] ([[User talk:FredrikT|talk]]) 21:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
'''Keep''' thanks to Chiswick Chap's sourcing. [[user: Thesteve|<font color="#FFFFFF"><font style="background:darkblue"> Th</font><font style="background:royalblue" >e S</font><font style="background:blue">te</font><font style="background:#6666FF">ve </font></font>]] 00:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' thanks to Chiswick Chap's sourcing. [[user: Thesteve|<font color="#FFFFFF"><font style="background:darkblue"> Th</font><font style="background:royalblue" >e S</font><font style="background:blue">te</font><font style="background:#6666FF">ve </font></font>]] 00:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
*''Delete'', fails to meet any of the criteria listed in [[WP:BAND]]. First criterion is non-trivial coverage "in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries" - the reviews listed seem to be more akin to blogs than online versions of print media (correct me if I'm wrong). [[Special:Contributions/126.109.230.149|126.109.230.149]] ([[User talk:126.109.230.149|talk]]) 01:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:31, 31 October 2011
- Tummel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Music group with no assertion of notability, I had declined speedy prior to make it a redirect Alexandria (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 04:13, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Try these:
- Ben Ohmart, The Muse's Muse - CD Review: Tummel - Klezmer. 17 Nov 2001.
- Chris Nickson CD Universe Review "A Danish/Swedish band with no deep Jewish roots playing klezmer? Well, why not, especially when it's done as well as Tummel does on Klezmer."
- Eelco Schilder Folkworld CD Reviews - Tummel 'Oy' "Oy is a fresh, strong cd and highly recommended to everybody who likes Klezmer music."
- Robert M Tilendis Green Man Review - Tummel 'Payback Time' "Think about the band playing on while the Titanic goes down. Think of some of Joel Gray's bitchier numbers in Cabaret. Think of Josephine Baker at her most outrageous taking Paris by storm. Think of a bunch of crazy Swedes with no inhibitions whatsoever getting together and letting everyone have it, right between the eyes. That might give an inkling of the tone of Tummel's Payback Time."
- Keep. Try these:
- I think that would be enough to demonstrate Notability. Actually I had a quick listen too. Not bad! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. I have swiftly added these reviews (with a few more quotes) to the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- I think that would be enough to demonstrate Notability. Actually I had a quick listen too. Not bad! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I was only aware that Tummel was well known enough in Sweden to be regarded as notable, but Chiswick Chap has shown above that - in addition to this - the band also has an international reputation which I was not aware of. /FredrikT (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Keep thanks to Chiswick Chap's sourcing. The Steve 00:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, fails to meet any of the criteria listed in WP:BAND. First criterion is non-trivial coverage "in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries" - the reviews listed seem to be more akin to blogs than online versions of print media (correct me if I'm wrong). 126.109.230.149 (talk) 01:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)