User talk:Jimididit: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:39, 28 March 2006

Relinking to Jebus Christ

Jebus is a banned username. You can't simply redirect to that user name through a kosher user name. JDoorj a m Talk 14:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We had just reached consensus in that discussion and I was about to remove the redirects. Thanks for removing them for me. Jimididit 14:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Man, that's whack. Jebus is not derogatory. It is meant in no way to offend anyone either. The admin's had to create some way to block you after putting up a show such as. I am a member of a forum that is run by Mormons and there is a username Jebus and do they throw a little hissy-fit? No. I think the whole thing was blown way out of proportion. - - DamienVryce - Word

Now i've been blocked for 'Idiot Trolling'

On User talk:Jimbo Wales I made two postings. The first was a complaint about the large number of administrators who treat editors with disrespect. The second was a suggestion that people shouldn't be posting hard core porn to their user pages.

At this stage i'd like to anounce my retirement from wikipedia. The actions of administrators on this web site hilight everything that's wrong with human nature. Adios Jimididit 17:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, be that as it may, I've unblocked you. - brenneman^{L} 17:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appologies

I appologise for accidently deleting your user page. someone has restored it before I had a chance to. I was attempting to steal some of your user boxes. Factoid Killer 04:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. No harm done. Jimididit 12:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I see you've had some trouble here on Wikipedia and have been blocked twice for very silly things. Instead of retiring altogether, why not move to a different wiki? I promise I'll let you use your Jebus username :) Gerard Foley 07:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerard. I might just do that. Jimididit 12:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time to let it go

Look, thanks for the support and all with regards to my sockpuppet allegation. The allegation has now been disproven. I suggest you just let it go. I know I have. NSWelshman 13:07, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You and J is me

On Talk:Football and various other pages, you have launched a vicious attack on me for blocking User:J is me for vandalism at User:Grant65. On a number of occasions you pointed out that the final act of vandalism came through IP User:62.254.168.102, and argued that there was no evidence that this vandal was J is me. With this edit you have confirmed that User:62.254.168.102 is in fact you!

I continue to hold the view that you and J is me are the same person. If I am wrong, then you have vandalised Grant's user page in order to spring a trap on me, and then launched a vicious attack on me in bad faith. Either way, your conduct is putrid, and you are no longer welcome here.

I will ask an uninvolved administrator to block you indefinitely.

Snottygobble 23:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

J is me is a troll and a sockpuppet of licinius. You know i'm not J is me and you are trying to bait me here. You know the two ip addresses came from different countries. My initial accusation to you was that you made a mistake because the two ip addresses were unrelated. It was when you ignored that fact over and over again and refused to answer the question that I had a problem.

I had a problem with the sockpuppet tag on NSWelshman because I knew there was no evidence to support it. This was proven once and for all yesterday. I also had a problem with the fact that the sockpuppet allegations were being thrown around in thw manner they were.

Why is it that you refused to make any attempts to communicate? Why is it that when I asked you questions about your actions on your talk page you considered it an act of trolling and deleted the questions. The truth is, I use a dynamic ip address and could have any ip from one day to the next. I knew the second ip address you accused of being j is me was Irish and that the first one wasn't. Why shouldn't I try to bring that to your attention after you've just blocked the wrong person indefinitely?

No matter what happens here, you are not a good administrator. You DO look after your mates. You throw around the word 'troll' for the stupidest things and I have no respect for you. Jimididit 12:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 I had a problem with the sockpuppet tag on NSWelshman because I knew there was no evidence to support it.  This was proven once and for all yesterday.  I also had a problem with the fact that the sockpuppet allegations were being thrown around in thw manner they were.
-Why is it that you refused to make any attempts to communicate?  Why is it that when I asked you questions about your actions on your talk page you considered it an act of trolling and deleted the questions.  The truth is, I use a dynamic ip address and could have any ip from one day to the next.  I knew the ip address you accused of being j is me was Irish and that's why I made the allegation.
+Why is it that you refused to make any attempts to communicate?  Why is it that when I asked you questions about your actions on your talk page you considered it an act of trolling and deleted the questions.  The truth is, I use a dynamic ip address and could have any ip from one day to the next.  I knew the second ip address you accused of being j is me was Irish and that the first one wasn't.  Why shouldn't I try to bring that to your attention after you've just blocked the wrong person indefinitely?
 No matter what happens here, you are not a good administrator.  You DO look after your mates.  You throw around the word 'troll' for the stupidest things and I have no respect for you. [[User:Jimididit|Jimididit]] 12:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)