User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry

Main     Talk     Awards     Archives Talkback Hello, Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry. You have new messages at Lhb1239's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Invitation to take part in Wikipedia survey Hello, Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry! We would like to know what you think of Wikipedia in your day-to-day editing. That's why we've created a survey here where you can answer all the questions about what you do here anonymously. What's more, the results will be used to make the editing experience better for all. Thank you. Sent by Rcsprinter123 (talk) at 17:00, 16 September 2024 UTC [refresh] on behalf of Wikimedia Surveys using AWB. Salted Article for Angel.com Hello there--I was pointed here by Phearson and JohnCD. I work for a marketing firm that's representing Angel, of Angel.com (full disclosure on my user page). In 2009, you salted Angel's article (it was Angel.com) because it had been recreated frequently by Kazuwiki, a user with a spammy history. JohnCD userfied the old article for me at User:Socialmedia2011/Angel.com and I'm just starting to work on updating it so that it lives up to Wikipedia quality and COI standards. It's nowhere near ready to be restored, but I wanted to reach out to let you know that I'm approaching this again and trying to get as much help from the Wiki community as possible to get this back up. Angel meets notability requirements with press from places such as Forbes and Information Week so it definitely merits a page. Would you be willing to provide feedback and, when it's ready, restore this article? Let me know, and thanks for your time! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC) Arguably, yes, but I'm not sure I have the time - I'm heavily involved in our fundraiser this year and I can't guarantee I'll be able to help quickly enough for you. If you're willing to wait a few days after asking, then by all means I can help :-) The Cavalry (Message me) 13:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Awesome, a few days response is pretty much what we're dealing with too--it's time consuming to sift through old press to form these articles, I don't know how you veteran Wikipedians do it! If I get help from a few other editors to get the article up to snuff, would you be willing to simply restore it? Let me know and best of luck with the fundraising. Socialmedia2011 (talk) 21:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Alright, I've made a few edits. It's shrunk down. Let me know if you see anything/the lack of anything that would stand in the way of getting this back up. Thanks! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 19:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Sorry for the confusion, just wanted to note that Phearson has moved the article here Articles_for_creation/Angel.com. I'm not sure if you have to play a role in getting it restored or what. Thanks for any help in advance! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Re: Chris Butler (private investigator) Hey. I see that you removed a vast majority of this article saying that it was unsourced and possibly libelous. In fact i took the time to reference several different sources including published first-person accounts in a magazine. I also referenced the recounting of said story on the radio and attributed some of the facts to other main-stream media sources. I'd be fine if you believe that certain facts taken from those two sources are not sufficiently reliable, but essentially blanking the page as if the sources don't exist doesn't seem to be very fair. Please let me know your rational. --Mblumber (talk) 14:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC) There are entire sections in the article that are libellous and unsourced: for example, the PI Moms section and the Dirty DUIs section doesn't have a single reference. Likewise, the 'Informant Carl Marino' only has a single reference to the Internet Movie Database - which isn't a reliable source. The article paints the man as a criminal when the sources only say that he was arrested, but doesn't seem to have been convicted. The entire article seems to be based off a single reliable source - an article in Diablo Magazine. The article uses words like 'notoriety', implying that he is 'notorious'. Finally, Marino is mentioned at the bottom without any proof that he's linked to Mr Butler whatsoever. Policy - and common sense - means that we remove any negative unsourced information in a BLP, and that it's not put back until it's properly sourced. The Cavalry (Message me) 16:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC) As Carl Marino, I can assure you all the information was correct and accurate. If you can't find sources that link me to Chris Butler and what was written, you aren't looking very hard. Keep watching the news magazine shows in the near future if you want to see everything confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlmarino (talk • contribs) 07:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC) Ok buddy. I went through and only included stuff that was specifically cited. If you decide to delete the information again without utilizing the talk page, I'm going to be upset. --Mblumber (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC) Meghan.reilly/Chicago2011/SquarePotato failling to grasp the nature of their block You may wish to take a look at User talk:Chicago2011 and this comment on my talk page. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC) Meghan.reilly isn't my account. Chicago2011 is my account - I've had it for almost a year. It's now banned, so I created this one. I've never had access to meghan.reilly. SquarePotato (talk) 23:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC) I am not aware that Chicago had his right to edit his own talk page revoked. Why is he now appealing from another account? Phearson (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Typo in navbar? Hey, I was trying to go through your archives to get to that image I linked you a while ago (it was surprisingly hard to find it the first time). I notice that the image link in your navbar points to "/Archive," not "/Archives," so that it takes a user to the first entry in the archive, rather than the index. (The text that says archives goes to "/Archives" and thus to the index). A bug perhaps? Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC) ps i'm not stalking you i swear Thanks for coming on Sunday! Thanks for coming on Sunday, was good to see you = ;) Mthe (talk) 00:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Removal of LGBT subsection Hi there! My name is Andrew, I'm on the current committee for Unity Bangor (LGBT) and I'm the previous Sexuality Equality Senator for the Student Union. Please forgive me if my formatting or mode of response is not in the correct style for Wikipedia (I have just made the account to comment on this specific issue). I agree with your statement that the LGBT society is "no more important than any other society", as all societies should be equal. However, each society has the option to create a post in this page and (on a personal note) I believe the post to be informative and valuable (this being a personal note because the Section on this page was one of the very first things I looked at when considering Bangor University) I have reinstated the section, as I believe its entry to be valid. May I make a request? I value your opinion and I'm more than willing to discuss this issue with you, however my familiarity with Wikipedia comments etc is really lacking. Would it be possible for you to email me personally and we can discuss any problems you have or arrange a compromise that should satisfy both parties? Before any further edits or removals that is. :) My personal email is: Psub25@bangor.ac.uk Thanks.