Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Stewart (politician) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
add comments |
Pmresource (talk | contribs) →Chris Stewart (politician): Comment |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Weak delete''' - as a politican, he's not notable by any stretch; as an author, he's right on the margin, based on a book that got to # 24 on the ''[[New York Times bestseller list]]''. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Weak delete''' - as a politican, he's not notable by any stretch; as an author, he's right on the margin, based on a book that got to # 24 on the ''[[New York Times bestseller list]]''. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per Bearian. I wrote the article, and agree that this fails [[WP:POLITICIAN]] - but is on the margin as an author. I recommend removing notes regarding political candidacy. Subject is not notable - by any stretch - as a politician. [[User:Ctmadsen|Ctmadsen]] ([[User talk:Ctmadsen|talk]]) 02:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per Bearian. I wrote the article, and agree that this fails [[WP:POLITICIAN]] - but is on the margin as an author. I recommend removing notes regarding political candidacy. Subject is not notable - by any stretch - as a politician. [[User:Ctmadsen|Ctmadsen]] ([[User talk:Ctmadsen|talk]]) 02:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''': Bearian's links to a Wikipedia article. This [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/books/review/InsideList-t.html?_r=1 one] is from the New York Times. Drop the word '(politician)' from the title then will probably vote Keep after familiarization with Wikipedia guidelines on Authors; provided, however, that everything is in order. [[User:Pmresource|Pmresource]] ([[User talk:Pmresource|talk]]) 16:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:31, 20 November 2011
AfDs for this article:
- Chris Stewart (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable politician. Appears to have some achievements; however, individual lacks GHits and GNEWS to support WP:NOTABILITY or WP:POLITICIAN. reddogsix (talk) 02:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN as an unelected candidate. He does have other accomplishments, but article asserts notability as a political candidate. We should not host campaign literature masquerading as a biography. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, per Cullen and per nominator. No significant coverage, especially on the basis of his political career. JFHJr (㊟) 05:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable politician with limited Google hits, and other forms of coverage. Tinton5 (talk) 07:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Weak delete - as a politican, he's not notable by any stretch; as an author, he's right on the margin, based on a book that got to # 24 on the New York Times bestseller list. Bearian (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Bearian. I wrote the article, and agree that this fails WP:POLITICIAN - but is on the margin as an author. I recommend removing notes regarding political candidacy. Subject is not notable - by any stretch - as a politician. Ctmadsen (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: Bearian's links to a Wikipedia article. This one is from the New York Times. Drop the word '(politician)' from the title then will probably vote Keep after familiarization with Wikipedia guidelines on Authors; provided, however, that everything is in order. Pmresource (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)