Talk:Black Like Me: Difference between revisions
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Which would be great...if racist rednecks like yourself didn't treat him in the same KKK way as other African-Americans during his travels. Shutting you down completely. [[Special:Contributions/124.169.119.39|124.169.119.39]] ([[User talk:124.169.119.39|talk]]) 13:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Harlequin |
Which would be great...if racist rednecks like yourself didn't treat him in the same KKK way as other African-Americans during his travels. Shutting you down completely. [[Special:Contributions/124.169.119.39|124.169.119.39]] ([[User talk:124.169.119.39|talk]]) 13:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Harlequin |
||
I love the assumptions there. I was asking if things were really that different back then that they cared more about pigment than facial features, the way race is judged today. It's careless of you to assume I must be a racist redneck because I was asking about them. |
Revision as of 03:37, 1 December 2011
Books Start‑class | |||||||
|
List of sources on race
You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Race Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on race relations and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library system at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to other academic libraries in the same large metropolitan area) and have been researching these issues sporadically since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 04:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Seriously?
Race is an issue of far more than just pigmentation. You can't just darken your skin and pass for black, the facial features are completely different (otherwise no-one would consider Sinbad "black." Were things so bad in the south that deeply tanned people were shunned? I mean, look at the guy's nose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.36.169 (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Which would be great...if racist rednecks like yourself didn't treat him in the same KKK way as other African-Americans during his travels. Shutting you down completely. 124.169.119.39 (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Harlequin
I love the assumptions there. I was asking if things were really that different back then that they cared more about pigment than facial features, the way race is judged today. It's careless of you to assume I must be a racist redneck because I was asking about them.