Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Weinstein: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Subject is only [[WP:RECENTISM|recently]] significant due to a [[WP:BLP1E|single event]]. No coverage outside of this event. Only 4/7 sentences in the article are even about him. v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 02:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
Subject is only [[WP:RECENTISM|recently]] significant due to a [[WP:BLP1E|single event]]. No coverage outside of this event. Only 4/7 sentences in the article are even about him. v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 02:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:'''comment'''(article creator) i agree 1 event is a concern; however: "If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented—as in the case of John Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981—a separate biography may be appropriate. The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources." we have here sustained international coverage. npr piece puts context of history of kidnappings. i would prefer to have a reliable source about his world bank experience. hard to say if it will rise to the level of [[Daniel Pearl]]. <font face="Vijaya">[[User:Slowking4| Slowking4]]</font>⇔[[User_talk:Slowking4| †@1₭]] 03:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
:'''comment'''(article creator) i agree 1 event is a concern; however: "If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented—as in the case of John Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981—a separate biography may be appropriate. The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources." we have here sustained international coverage. npr piece puts context of history of kidnappings. i would prefer to have a reliable source about his world bank experience. hard to say if it will rise to the level of [[Daniel Pearl]]. <font face="Vijaya">[[User:Slowking4| Slowking4]]</font>⇔[[User_talk:Slowking4| †@1₭]] 03:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
Looks like it's not a single little story http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-15996128 |
|||
Revision as of 12:12, 2 December 2011
Warren Weinstein
- Warren Weinstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is only recently significant due to a single event. No coverage outside of this event. Only 4/7 sentences in the article are even about him. v/r - TP 02:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- comment(article creator) i agree 1 event is a concern; however: "If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented—as in the case of John Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981—a separate biography may be appropriate. The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources." we have here sustained international coverage. npr piece puts context of history of kidnappings. i would prefer to have a reliable source about his world bank experience. hard to say if it will rise to the level of Daniel Pearl. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks like it's not a single little story http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-15996128