Talk:Peak–end rule: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
BwookeGlass (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Backpacker's Amnesia== |
==Backpacker's Amnesia== |
||
Just a thought regarding this. Within my hiking group we often joke about 'Hiker's Amnesia', which is the state that occurs after a particularly long and difficult hike. When you come off the trail you may swear to sell your gear and live the rest of your life in a chair, but as little as a week later when the next hike begins, you're right at the front of the line. --[[User:24.4.183.207|24.4.183.207]] 23:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC) |
Just a thought regarding this. Within my hiking group we often joke about 'Hiker's Amnesia', which is the state that occurs after a particularly long and difficult hike. When you come off the trail you may swear to sell your gear and live the rest of your life in a chair, but as little as a week later when the next hike begins, you're right at the front of the line. --[[User:24.4.183.207|24.4.183.207]] 23:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Evaluation for Psych 101== |
|||
I believe that is article is informative but vague. The information is backed up with a reference and an example on an experiment. In order for it to be reliable,it needs to be more descriptive with several credible sources. [[User:BwookeGlass|BwookeGlass]] ([[User talk:BwookeGlass|talk]]) --BwookeGlass 00:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:38, 12 December 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peak–end rule article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Philosophy: Logic Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Psychology Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Doesn't the experiment described in the second paragraph (painful noises versus painful followed by less-painful noises) tend to disprove the peak-end rule? It's a shame there's no citation for it. 67.158.76.243 02:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
'Disprove'? How does this disprove the peak end rule? Let's say it hurts a bit more more to be punched in the nose than to be punched in the shoulder. I give you the choice, get punched in the nose, or get punched in the nose and then punched in the shoulder. Which would you pick? The peak-end rule says that the brain will experience the first (just getting punched in the nose) as a worse experience than the second (getting punched in the nose and in the shoulder). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.235.6 (talk) 12:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Indeed this article is totally rotten. read it again and fix it. the examples refutes the rule. SHIMONSHA (talk) 18:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Backpacker's Amnesia
Just a thought regarding this. Within my hiking group we often joke about 'Hiker's Amnesia', which is the state that occurs after a particularly long and difficult hike. When you come off the trail you may swear to sell your gear and live the rest of your life in a chair, but as little as a week later when the next hike begins, you're right at the front of the line. --24.4.183.207 23:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Evaluation for Psych 101
I believe that is article is informative but vague. The information is backed up with a reference and an example on an experiment. In order for it to be reliable,it needs to be more descriptive with several credible sources. BwookeGlass (talk) --BwookeGlass 00:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)