User talk:24.228.90.14

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been warned, when you edited from your account, not to mess around on the reference desks. You have been blocked for continuing to do so. TNXMan 18:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 18:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.228.90.14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

on one hand this was a fair block, but on the other hand it is not fair at all. i asked a lot of intelligence questions, and none of the questions i asked on the rference desk were stupid, they were of a thought provoke nature. I would like the community to review the length of this block because i am not sure i asked any stupid reference questions in the past several months. thank you. 24.228.90.14 (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. Your comments indicate that you do not understand why you were blocked, despite warnings here and at your prior account. Based on your comments below, there is no evidence that the problematic behavior would stop if you were unblocked. Jayron32 21:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Before any decision is reached, could you list any other accounts you have edited under? This is so we can tell how far-reaching this pattern of behavior is; that would give us an indication of how likely it is to repeat. --Jayron32 19:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I LIKE TO EDIT ANONYMOUSLY. and i have lots of internet ip in the past for many years but i forgot wut i[ address they use. when i have to log in, i log in as Fran Cranley. but that is my real name so pls do not publicize it, and it is my ONLY ACCOUNT.

Since you've admitted it, a brief review of Special:Contributions/Fran_Cranley should assist the reviewing admin. TNXMan 20:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

WHY WOULD I NOT "ADMIT" IT!!!!!11 U R A CHECK USER, SO U CAN SEE FOR YOURSELF.

Please remain calm -- a hot temper won't help your case at all. I understand that you enjoy posting those questions, but I don't think I'm inclined to unblock you if that's all you're going to do. It's not really what the reference desk is for. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

i am calm. i just had some caps lock on. sorry, also i will edit other pages too if unblock me and i will only do 1 or two question on the ref desk each day AT THE MOST but most days i will do ZERO questions, just as i have in the past. like one time i made some productive writing and copyedits to Jabba the Hutt article, u can see for yourself.

It isn't the number of questions. If you believe that you were blocked merely for the number of questions you asked, I can see no reason to unblock you then, as you do not appear to have a level of self-awareness necessary to conform your behavior to acceptable norms. --Jayron32 21:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

OMG MY BLOCK IS ALMOST EXPIRE.

I've reblocked you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a fortnight for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

24.228.90.14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know i ask some silly question in the past. but this is not VANDALISM. i asked if human poop (i.e., feces) always contains e. coli. i am sorry if this makes some ppl giggle or uncomfortable, but it is a serious question and it have to do with illness and disease and food poisioning, and it is a legitimate question. i dont see any thing "vandal"-istic about it. please tell me wut i did wrong. Also, I see that user:Kainaw is spreading untruths about me as u can see here[1]. I am not "regularly" asking questions about poop, anus, uranus?????? where is the evidence for this. I asked ONE question about e. coli and human poop today and i dont believe I EVER asked questions about anus or uranus and i did not "vandalize" an article yesterday, i just added some facts about amoebas that I read in the news. This is really unfairness.24.228.90.14 (talk) 15:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I know i ask some silly question in the past. but this is not VANDALISM. i asked if human poop (i.e., feces) always contains e. coli. i am sorry if this makes some ppl giggle or uncomfortable, but it is a serious question and it have to do with illness and disease and food poisioning, and it is a legitimate question. i dont see any thing "vandal"-istic about it. please tell me wut i did wrong. Also, I see that user:Kainaw is spreading untruths about me as u can see here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=466696015&oldid=466695864]. I am not "regularly" asking questions about poop, anus, uranus?????? where is the evidence for this. I asked ONE question about e. coli and human poop today and i dont believe I EVER asked questions about anus or uranus and i did not "vandalize" an article yesterday, i just added some facts about amoebas that I read in the news. This is really unfairness.[[Special:Contributions/24.228.90.14|24.228.90.14]] ([[User talk:24.228.90.14#top|talk]]) 15:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know i ask some silly question in the past. but this is not VANDALISM. i asked if human poop (i.e., feces) always contains e. coli. i am sorry if this makes some ppl giggle or uncomfortable, but it is a serious question and it have to do with illness and disease and food poisioning, and it is a legitimate question. i dont see any thing "vandal"-istic about it. please tell me wut i did wrong. Also, I see that user:Kainaw is spreading untruths about me as u can see here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=466696015&oldid=466695864]. I am not "regularly" asking questions about poop, anus, uranus?????? where is the evidence for this. I asked ONE question about e. coli and human poop today and i dont believe I EVER asked questions about anus or uranus and i did not "vandalize" an article yesterday, i just added some facts about amoebas that I read in the news. This is really unfairness.[[Special:Contributions/24.228.90.14|24.228.90.14]] ([[User talk:24.228.90.14#top|talk]]) 15:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know i ask some silly question in the past. but this is not VANDALISM. i asked if human poop (i.e., feces) always contains e. coli. i am sorry if this makes some ppl giggle or uncomfortable, but it is a serious question and it have to do with illness and disease and food poisioning, and it is a legitimate question. i dont see any thing "vandal"-istic about it. please tell me wut i did wrong. Also, I see that user:Kainaw is spreading untruths about me as u can see here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=466696015&oldid=466695864]. I am not "regularly" asking questions about poop, anus, uranus?????? where is the evidence for this. I asked ONE question about e. coli and human poop today and i dont believe I EVER asked questions about anus or uranus and i did not "vandalize" an article yesterday, i just added some facts about amoebas that I read in the news. This is really unfairness.[[Special:Contributions/24.228.90.14|24.228.90.14]] ([[User talk:24.228.90.14#top|talk]]) 15:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}