Template:Did you know nominations/Research Works Act: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:39, 12 January 2012

(

)

... that the Research Works Act introduced in the United States House of Representatives ~~calls for~~ a ban on open access mandates for federally funded research?

Created/expanded by Gobonobo (talk), Mietchen (talk), DarTar (talk). Nominated by Gobonobo (talk) at 21:25, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Length and dates are OK. Article is thoroughly footnoted. Seems to be OK w/r/t plagiarism/copyvio matters. The hook fact is basically OK, but I have minor quibbles with its wording (the "Act" wasn't introduced, only a bill was introduced; also, the bill does not "call for" a ban, but rather it would impose a ban). For accuracy I would reword it as follows:

ALT1 ... that the Research Works Act proposed in the U.S. House of Representatives would ban open access mandates for federally funded research?

I was not aware of this bill, so I appreciate the article and hook! --Orlady (talk) 16:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I am fine with ALT1. --Mietchen (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ::*'''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Research Works Act]]''' proposed in the [[United States House of Representatives|U.S. House of Representatives]] would ban [[open access mandate]]s for federally funded research?
 ::I was not aware of this bill, so I appreciate the article and hook! --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 16:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
+::I am fine with ALT1. --[[User:Mietchen|Mietchen]] ([[User talk:Mietchen|talk]]) 23:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->