Jump to content

Talk:2011 Mubadala World Tennis Championship (December) – Singles: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP-Tennis}}
{{WP-Tennis}}
There is no explanation why the #1 seed had to play quarter finals, and why #2 & #3 had not. [[Special:Contributions/82.141.66.232|82.141.66.232]] ([[User talk:82.141.66.232|talk]]) 05:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
There is no explanation why the #1 seed had to play quarter finals, and why #2 & #3 had not. [[Special:Contributions/82.141.66.232|82.141.66.232]] ([[User talk:82.141.66.232|talk]]) 05:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

:Oh. It was/is there, but in rather strange place: just above the seeding list. "Last year's finalists receive a bye into the semifinals." [[Special:Contributions/82.141.66.232|82.141.66.232]] ([[User talk:82.141.66.232|talk]]) 10:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:32, 28 January 2012

WikiProject iconTennis NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

There is no explanation why the #1 seed had to play quarter finals, and why #2 & #3 had not. 82.141.66.232 (talk) 05:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. It was/is there, but in rather strange place: just above the seeding list. "Last year's finalists receive a bye into the semifinals." 82.141.66.232 (talk) 10:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]