Talk:Cadillac ATS: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:28, 4 February 2012

This car isnt made yet? i think it should be deleted! --Jakobdorsey (talk) 03:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official Press Release

I'm updating the article with the official information GM made available here. I'll make sure to cite everything once done. --Aizuku (talk) 06:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ATS ?

Does anyone know what ATS stands for according to GM? (I resist, but only with difficulty, the temptation to enter a suggestion according to me.) Thank you (if you did) for adding the answer to the entry. Regards Charles01 (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Research. If you don't have a source to back it up then don't add it. --Aizuku (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLS Replacement?

"The ATS was designed as a replacement for the badge-engineered, SAAB-based BLS."

Anyone else feel that the above statement from the article is problematic? I believe that Cadillac's design goals were far more strategic than creating a replacement for the Europe-only, badge-engineered, slow-selling, Saab-based, BLS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esfellers (talk • contribs) 20:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is true though, this car fits the same segment of the ATS and most of what I've seen sugests it's mostly geared towards another attempt to get sales in europe. (Morcus (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Revision as of 20:59, 20 January 2012 edit Esfellers (talk \| contribs) 20 edits m →‎BLS Replacement? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:28, 4 February 2012 edit undo Morcus (talk \| contribs) 461 edits →‎BLS Replacement? Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Anyone else feel that the above statement from the article is problematic? I believe that Cadillac's design goals were far more strategic than creating a replacement for the Europe-only, badge-engineered, slow-selling, Saab-based, BLS. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Esfellers\|Esfellers]] ([[User talk:Esfellers\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Esfellers\|contribs]]) 20:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Anyone else feel that the above statement from the article is problematic? I believe that Cadillac's design goals were far more strategic than creating a replacement for the Europe-only, badge-engineered, slow-selling, Saab-based, BLS. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Esfellers\|Esfellers]] ([[User talk:Esfellers\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Esfellers\|contribs]]) 20:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			It is true though, this car fits the same segment of the ATS and most of what I've seen sugests it's mostly geared towards another attempt to get sales in europe. ([[User:Morcus\|Morcus]] ([[User talk:Morcus\|talk]]) 09:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC))