User talk:Aizuku

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Aizuku, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! A8UDI talk 12:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:2010 Cadillac SLS.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:2010 Cadillac SLS.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Images in you User Space

Hey there Aizuku, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Aizuku/Sandbox/GM Daewoo. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

iPhone/iPod Touch

What does having a category mean for this? That doesn't mean anything. Also, most sites have a general mobile section, none of the major gaming sites have sections just for iPhone/iPod Touch. The fact is that neither are game machines, they are a phone/MP3 player that is also capable of playing games. It's no different than every other smartphone out there (Apple doesn't even call the iPhone a game machine), the only difference is that Apple tries and claims it is. Why not list every cellphone made in the last 10 years since they are the same as the iPhone and iPod Touch. TJ Spyke 19:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A general mobile section is one thing, but having a section dedicated for iPhone games, puts it on par with DS and PSP. Apple doesn't call the iPhone a game machine, but Apple is aggressively marketing the iPod touch as such. The iPhone is iPod touch + phone. --Aizuku (talk) 20:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please provide evidence when arguing a article content removal discussion

Your recent edits to the talk page of the seventh generation of gaming, in regards to iPods/iPhones/iPads being hand-held dedicated game consoles could be seen as zealous, or even anti-NPoV. "You're right, get over it" is not an appropriate way to argue for your beliefs. If you however had a IGN or GameStop or Lyoko Haven or GameSpy or any other reliable gaming news source, one may be more entitled to possibly agree with, or even support you. And for the record, I don't work for Wikipedia, I'm just a normal editor like you, trying to improve the largest online encyclopedia in the world.--ILoveSky (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I was out of line, sorry --10:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Renesas logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Renesas logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by GDP (PPP) per hour worked

As nearly all contributions to the discussion of that article are highly critical, would you help to improve it? Knopffabrik (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you have not listed Johnson and Johnson in list of congloms...they are one of the biggest competitors of P&G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.174.22.27 (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aizuku. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:GeoSpark, from its old location at User:Aizuku/Sandbox/geoSpark. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:IFighter, from its old location at User:Aizuku/Sandbox/iFighter. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ridge Racer Accelerated, from its old location at User:Aizuku/Sandbox/Ridge Racer Accelerated. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ridge Racer Accelerated (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This material should be used to expand [[[Ridge Racer]] perhaps as a subsection. I'm not seeing enough to justify anstand alone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ridge Racer Accelerated and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Aizuku, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ridge Racer Accelerated concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ridge Racer Accelerated, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GeoSpark concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:GeoSpark, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:IFighter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:IFighter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ridge Racer Accelerated

Hello, Aizuku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ridge Racer Accelerated".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GeoSpark

Hello, Aizuku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GeoSpark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IFighter

Hello, Aizuku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IFighter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geo-Defense (January 15)

{{subst:Afc reject|full=Draft:Geo-Defense|reason=n|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment= This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. If this draft is resubmitted without providing references, it should be nominated for deletion.

{{subst:staledraft}

Does not satisfy game notability.|sig=yes}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Um, shouldn't this be G13'ed or something. It doesn't make any sense.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader

Draft:2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:2012 Semiconductors Sales Leader during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]