Talk:Lily Serna: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:05, 8 February 2012

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Media release

Given that http://newsroom.uts.edu.au/news/2010/10/letters-and-numbers is a media release, might the photo used be acceptable to use here? 59.167.126.21 (talk) 22:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I'm not up to date on whether including the photo with a press release means that it is in the public domain. You might wish to read Wikipedia:Image use policy for some guidance. I haven't tracked down a relevant discussion board, but when I do I'll ask for a more input. Blarneytherinosaur ^gabby? 12:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's completely fine under fair use in Australia, where the document is sourced. From a legal point of view it is fine. However from a Wikipedia policy point of view there's a high chance someone will CC claim it and request deletion, so don't bother. I've looked everywhere for a photograph for this article that won't be arbitrarily deleted but cannot find one, although there are several hundred that could legally be used, again, policy won't allow it. 211.30.150.122 (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:54, 4 April 2011 edit Blarneytherinosaur (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 5,663 edits →‎Media release ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:05, 8 February 2012 edit undo 211.30.150.122 (talk) →‎Media release Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Good question. I'm not up to date on whether including the photo with a press release means that it is in the public domain. You might wish to read [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]] for some guidance. I haven't tracked down a relevant discussion board, but when I do I'll ask for a more input. [[User:Blarneytherinosaur\|Blarneytherinosaur]] <sup>[[User_talk:Blarneytherinosaur\|gabby?]]</sup> 12:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)		:Good question. I'm not up to date on whether including the photo with a press release means that it is in the public domain. You might wish to read [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]] for some guidance. I haven't tracked down a relevant discussion board, but when I do I'll ask for a more input. [[User:Blarneytherinosaur\|Blarneytherinosaur]] <sup>[[User_talk:Blarneytherinosaur\|gabby?]]</sup> 12:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

			::It's completely fine under fair use in Australia, where the document is sourced. From a legal point of view it is fine. However from a Wikipedia policy point of view there's a high chance someone will CC claim it and request deletion, so don't bother. I've looked everywhere for a photograph for this article that won't be arbitrarily deleted but cannot find one, although there are several hundred that could legally be used, again, policy won't allow it. [[Special:Contributions/211.30.150.122\|211.30.150.122]] ([[User talk:211.30.150.122\|talk]]) 05:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)