Talk:J. Edgar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:34, 11 February 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the J. Edgar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies Stub‑class

	LGBT portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Copyright re movieinsider.com

The site movieinsider.com has no real content and the bot has basically hit false positives. Comparing the two sites we see no way that copyright could have been violated, since the duplication detection only detected that both sites had the same facts about the movie correct! Bots /cannot/ accurately judge copyright violations--at best they can possibly detect plagiarism.Thegeneralguy (talk) 23:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a bot. Elizium23 (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Outline

There needs to be a plot outline for this movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.31.46.14 (talk) 02:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Accuracy

One line under the section Historical Accuracy needs to be cross-reference, and probably removed. (I have cross-referenced, but I'm sure that such things require double-cross-referencing.) The line reads: "The references to the sexual proclivities of both President John F. Kennedy and The Reverend Martin Luther King Junior are for the most part speculation and not based on any hard facts and..." Interestingly, on the Wiki Page referencing (Dr./Rev.) Mr. Martin Luther King, Jr. some significant evidence is provided, including where Mr. King himself admitted: King explained his extramarital affairs as "a form of anxiety reduction." All FBI records regarding Mr. King's adulterous affairs (and all other FBI surveillance regarding him) are set to be released in 2027. The way this Historical Accuracy section reads at the moment almost seems like someone's attempt to white-wash the truth and rewrite history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.242.49.192 (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Bruno Hauptmann

Richard Hauptmann was framed (deliberately called Bruno), and later beaten / tortured. It is a disgrace that Eastwood did not show this historical point in his movie. It seems to me, a certain "anti-German" sentiment played along. German American J. Edgar Hoover is portrayed as an egocentric gay, German American Norman Schwarzkopf, Sr. as incompetent and German American Hauptmann as a greedy child murder. A bit too black and white, don't you think?! 91.65.16.181 (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 One line under the section Historical Accuracy needs to be cross-reference, and probably removed.  (I have cross-referenced, but I'm sure that such things require double-cross-referencing.)  The line reads: "''The references to the sexual proclivities of both President John F. Kennedy and The Reverend Martin Luther King Junior are for the most part speculation and not based on any hard facts and...''"  Interestingly, on the Wiki Page referencing (Dr./Rev.) Mr. Martin Luther King, Jr. some significant evidence is provided, including where Mr. King himself admitted: ''King explained his extramarital affairs as "a form of anxiety reduction."''  All FBI records regarding Mr. King's adulterous affairs (and all other FBI surveillance regarding him) are set to be released in 2027.  The way this Historical Accuracy section reads at the moment almost seems like someone's attempt to white-wash the truth and rewrite history.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.242.49.192|66.242.49.192]] ([[User talk:66.242.49.192|talk]]) 08:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Richard Bruno Hauptmann ==
+Richard Hauptmann was framed (deliberately called ''Bruno''), and later beaten / tortured. It is a disgrace that Eastwood did not show this historical point in his movie. It seems to me, a certain "anti-German" sentiment played along. [[German American]] J. Edgar Hoover is portrayed as an egocentric gay, [[German American]] Norman Schwarzkopf, Sr. as incompetent and [[German American]] Hauptmann as a greedy child murder. A bit too ''black and white'', don't you think?! [[Special:Contributions/91.65.16.181|91.65.16.181]] ([[User talk:91.65.16.181|talk]]) 18:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)