Talk:Mohanlal

All anti mohan lal fans now lick your elbow. Have you seen NARAN he is still the best. He will be the best. He will be always in my heart. Till I die. He is my all in all. I will die for him. And so will be all his fans. Rakesh Ravikumar

lists

first, the above comment ought to be deleted; but i hear in talk pages one does not edit or delete other people's comments, hence the above one is ignored and left as such. the lists in the article are confusing; one list reads, "major films" another reads important films; one contains more films, the other has films in diff languages; and they are in reverse orders. i propose the two lists be merged into one, which order to place it is arbitrary: -Pournami 10:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The above comment can be deleted as it may be considered vandalism. But I don't know the process yet, so I am leaving up to other Wikipedias to do the same. Also, the list on the article has only Malayalam language. It should have some Hindi language films too.—vedant (talk • contribs) 16:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

POV

A lot of POV comments below the heading "Criticism".I am adding a POV tag.--Sahodaran 10:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

I have made some changes. How is it now? If you stll feel it is POV, just edit it.--Raghu 13:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

yeah,its okay as of now.but the things that come under crticisms in the present article is something that praises lal.the content is somewhat okay,but it should not come under the heading Criticisms.Also,I think lal is behind Aashirwad productions and Antony Perumbaavoor.So why dont we mention it?--Sahodaran 06:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Criticisms don't have to be negative (shortcomings) always, so even the praises should be written under Criticisms. I have listed two negative criticisms that I know. If you don't have any objection I will remove the POV tag.--Raghu 15:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)