Talk:Lower Makefield Township, Pennsylvania

Untitled

Not all of Lower Makefield is "Yardley." A considerable part of the township is Morrisville. Additionally, the Yardley Post Office acts as a substation for the Morrisville Post Office, located in Falls Township.

Don't bother trying to reason with whomever insists on changing it back. Apparently, he/she has no clue about how the post office works for the 19067 code.

I live in the corner of Lower Makefield Township. Middletown Township is across the street, and Newtown Township is about a mile or so up the road. My mailman is dispatched from the MORRISVILLE Post Office in Falls Township, which is the MAIN post office for 19067. A significant portion of Lower Makefield is in the town (but not the borough) of Morrisville. God forbid you would let facts get in your way.

Additionally, the 19067 zip code is nowhere near the top of the wealth list in the state. Google "Wealthiest PA Zip Codes" and see what you find. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.54.94.27 (talk) 14:16:32, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

The above writers mix apples and oranges. This listing is about Lower Makefield Township not about zip code 19067. According to the 2000 US Census Lower Makefield Twp. had the eigth highest median household income in the Commonwealth at $98,090.00.

With regard to zip codes, none of Lower Makefield is "Yardley" or "Morrisville" or any other place for that matter. Each are incorporated municipalities that border Lower Makefield. They share, in many cases, a zip code which is only a postal address - not to be confused with a municipal boundry or anything else. 208.17.34.25 15:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

"Lower Makefield" is not an acceptable mailing location according to the USPS website. Lower Makefield residents are supposed to use either "Morrisville" or "Yardley." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.94.26 (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

A request:: Can someone sort out all of that nonsense involving the wealthiness of LMT? I thought I had fixed it, removing what seems to be to be very false claims about its wealth rankings, but someone has added it back and expanded on it. If it is true, could whoever wrote it cite their sources? I am only finding information that contradicts it. 165.82.72.229 20:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I tried to do the same, but whoever is posting the BS figures insists on reverting the version of the entry. This is despite evidence that clearly disproves their claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.250.214.23 (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Same here. It's pointless since whoever continues to add to the fluff piece is obviously not interested in facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.112.82.19 (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Who put all the fluff pieces in this article? This piece reads like an infomercial for Lower Makefield. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.237.189 (talk) 16:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I just read through this "informercial" (as it was called above) on Lower Makefield and have to say that it needs a serious clean-up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.76.164 (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Kristin Huggins murder

I think this should be mentioned in the article.Bronayur (talk) 18:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Ref link 2 to Census is busted

The link to the census page (Ref #2) aint working. Please fix.