Jump to content

Talk:Citroën XM: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


: Too long, and I think it should appear after the basic description, suspension & engine sections. I can't see cause to delete it entirely though - such a section is an important part of coverage, especially for cars like Citroëns that tend to polarise an audience into fans and critics. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
: Too long, and I think it should appear after the basic description, suspension & engine sections. I can't see cause to delete it entirely though - such a section is an important part of coverage, especially for cars like Citroëns that tend to polarise an audience into fans and critics. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Comment to the table on max speed and acceleration time etc: The "official" numbers for 0-100 km/h for XM 3,0 V6.24 year 1991 to 1993 was actually 8,0 and NOT 8,6 s. I have several sales brochures that document that 1991, 1993, 1994). From 1994 the number was changed to 8,6 s for some reason I do not know.

Revision as of 15:04, 14 March 2012

WikiProject iconAutomobiles Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article needs to mention what year the facelift occurred! Ideally in the section about the differences between phase 1 and phase 2.LilRedCasanova 16:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Critical appraisal

I think the "Critical appraisal" section is far too long. Does anybody object if I delete it entirely? Biscuittin (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too long, and I think it should appear after the basic description, suspension & engine sections. I can't see cause to delete it entirely though - such a section is an important part of coverage, especially for cars like Citroëns that tend to polarise an audience into fans and critics. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment to the table on max speed and acceleration time etc: The "official" numbers for 0-100 km/h for XM 3,0 V6.24 year 1991 to 1993 was actually 8,0 and NOT 8,6 s. I have several sales brochures that document that 1991, 1993, 1994). From 1994 the number was changed to 8,6 s for some reason I do not know.