Talk:Citroën XM: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Too long, and I think it should appear after the basic description, suspension & engine sections. I can't see cause to delete it entirely though - such a section is an important part of coverage, especially for cars like Citroëns that tend to polarise an audience into fans and critics. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC) |
: Too long, and I think it should appear after the basic description, suspension & engine sections. I can't see cause to delete it entirely though - such a section is an important part of coverage, especially for cars like Citroëns that tend to polarise an audience into fans and critics. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
Comment to the table on max speed and acceleration time etc: The "official" numbers for 0-100 km/h for XM 3,0 V6.24 year 1991 to 1993 was actually 8,0 and NOT 8,6 s. I have several sales brochures that document that 1991, 1993, 1994). From 1994 the number was changed to 8,6 s for some reason I do not know. |
Revision as of 15:04, 14 March 2012
Automobiles Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of better quality photo needed be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article needs to mention what year the facelift occurred! Ideally in the section about the differences between phase 1 and phase 2.LilRedCasanova 16:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Critical appraisal
I think the "Critical appraisal" section is far too long. Does anybody object if I delete it entirely? Biscuittin (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Too long, and I think it should appear after the basic description, suspension & engine sections. I can't see cause to delete it entirely though - such a section is an important part of coverage, especially for cars like Citroëns that tend to polarise an audience into fans and critics. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment to the table on max speed and acceleration time etc: The "official" numbers for 0-100 km/h for XM 3,0 V6.24 year 1991 to 1993 was actually 8,0 and NOT 8,6 s. I have several sales brochures that document that 1991, 1993, 1994). From 1994 the number was changed to 8,6 s for some reason I do not know.