Jump to content

Talk:Mutineers' Moon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: Line 8:


: Fixed. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 20:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
: Fixed. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 20:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

This article should be deleted. It doesn't seem to be significant (popular or influential) and the article is basically nothing more than a plot summary.

Revision as of 18:20, 26 March 2012

WikiProject iconScience Fiction Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNovels: Sci-fi Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Science fiction task force.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Series name incorrect

The name of this series, as listed on the Baen web site ( http://www.baen.com/series_list.asp#Dahak ), is the "Dahak Series", not the "Heirs of Empire" Series which is the name of the third book. Oracleofbargth (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Debresser (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be deleted. It doesn't seem to be significant (popular or influential) and the article is basically nothing more than a plot summary.