Talk:The BioLogos Foundation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:20, 1 April 2012

Christianity Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Background

In the article on theistic evolution is found the following:

"Theistic evolution or evolutionary creation is a concept that asserts that classical religious teachings about God are compatible with the modern scientific understanding about biological evolution. In short, theistic evolutionists believe that there is a God, that God is the creator of the material universe and (by consequence) all life within, and that biological evolution is simply a natural process within that creation. Evolution, according to this view, is simply a tool that God employed to develop human life.'

In this article the definition of theistic evolution, as copied from the Biologos webpage is something to the effect that God used evolution to create life.

These seem to be conflicting statements. I thought that theistic evolution described how the process of evolution occured as a natural process after God created life?Desoto10 (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

outright bias

The section about BioLogos is incredibly patronizing. I'm sure there are more eminent people who support it. Right now the article seems to suggest that the U of Chicago hack made some grand point about the frivolity of the organization. It seems a bit ridiculous to include the petty disrespect of some pathetic leftist on the page of the first man to map the humane genome. He doesn't even raise a good point about the organization, just slanders it in a way that could be done to absolutely any organization in existence.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 These seem to be conflicting statements.  I thought that theistic evolution described how the process of evolution occured as a natural process after God created life?[[User:Desoto10|Desoto10]] ([[User talk:Desoto10|talk]]) 06:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
+==outright bias==
+The section about BioLogos is incredibly patronizing. I'm sure there are more eminent people who support it. Right now the article seems to suggest that the U of Chicago hack made some grand point about the frivolity of the organization. It seems a bit ridiculous to include the petty disrespect of some pathetic leftist on the page of the first man to map the humane genome. He doesn't even raise a good point about the organization, just slanders it in a way that could be done to absolutely any organization in existence.