Talk:Nikon D800: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:40, 9 April 2012

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Photography Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disagree with Not Appropriate and Single Source tags. 212.60.42.111 (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They'll probably be removed in the next few hours. The D800 is being officially announced as we speak—in fact, Nikon Brazil has already issued a press release that's made it (in translated form) to any number of English-language sites. We should get the official word from other Nikon subsidiaries any moment now. — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Turns out that wasn't from Nikon Brazil. It was apparently Nikon's official Japanese press release, translated into Portuguese and posted on a Brazilian site. — Dale Arnett (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-release rumors/development

Paragraph starting:

"The camera was rumored..."

The speculation regarding the delayed release of the camera aren't very relevant now that it's been announced officially. Should that entire section be removed? Filemeaway (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NikonD800Purchase.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:NikonD800Purchase.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:NikonD800Purchase.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rear screen : dots or pixels?

There is sthg wrong about pixels or dots in the rear screen description in the right column. 921K dots are 921K pixels, I dont see how it can be equivalent to 307K pixels as written By the way, Nikon always talk about pixels for their rear screen. I think we should delete this conversion in pixels.

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 20:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 |}
+== Rear screen : dots or pixels? ==
+There is sthg wrong about pixels or dots in the rear screen description in the right column. 921K dots are 921K pixels, I dont see how it can be equivalent to 307K pixels as written By the way, Nikon always talk about pixels for their rear screen. I think we should delete this conversion in pixels.