Talk:Achilleid: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:05, 9 April 2012

Books C‑class

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Classical Greece and Rome Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Edit

I've reedited this page to give more information about the poem. I hope you enjoy.Jdf8 (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So this is what you were doing when you were supposed to be reading the Heroides? The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 11:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zkatroy

I am glad to see you're working on expanding the article. That said, I think that adding in pieces of commentary in the content section is a little odd. The "contents" should simply be a plot summary, not a running commentary on the lines. Also, in the final section are you summarizing the Transvestite Achilles, or are you contributing your own research? If you are merely summarizing you should say that that's what youre doing; if you are adding in original research, that's not allowed and it should be removed. Jdf8 (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 I've reedited this page to give more information about the poem. I hope you enjoy.[[User:Jdf8|Jdf8]] ([[User talk:Jdf8|talk]]) 02:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 : So this is what you were doing when you were supposed to be reading the ''Heroides''? [[User:Cardiffchestnut|The Cardiff Chestnut]] ([[User talk:Cardiffchestnut|talk]]) 11:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+== Zkatroy ==
+I am glad to see you're working on expanding the article. That said, I think that adding in pieces of commentary in the content section is a little odd. The "contents" should simply be a plot summary, not a running commentary on the lines. Also, in the final section are you summarizing the Transvestite Achilles, or are you contributing your own research? If you are merely summarizing you should say that that's what youre doing; if you are adding in original research, that's not allowed and it should be removed. [[User:Jdf8|Jdf8]] ([[User talk:Jdf8|talk]]) 16:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)