Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ridgewell: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:00, 11 May 2012

Thomas Ridgewell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This YouTube personality does not meet the notability criteria - there is no evidence of extensive coverage in reliable, independent sources (though there are all of the social networking hits one would expect for someone trying to promote himself/become famous on the internet.) [1][2] Article was created by a single-purpose editor. Dawn Bard (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I believe that this article's subject matter is notable. There are enough independent sources to deem it so (Although very little, still enough. I think.). And while work does need to be done on this article, I think that the popularity of this person’s videos and appearances on other YouTube personality's videos proves it's notability enough. Zach Winkler (talk) 23:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 This YouTube personality does not meet the notability criteria - there is no evidence of extensive coverage in reliable, independent sources (though there are all of the social networking hits one would expect for someone trying to promote himself/become famous on the internet.) [http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22Thomas+Ridgewell%E2%80%8E%22++-wikipedia+-facebook+-linkedin+-tumblr&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:*&prmd=ivnso&ei=iw-pT7vIEoj56QHkiqm1BA&start=440&sa=N][http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22Thomas+Ridgewell%E2%80%8E%22++-wikipedia+-facebook+-linkedin+-tumblr&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:*&tbm=nws&prmd=ivnso&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=lQ-pT_jECaeO6gG45oD6CA&ved=0CB4QpwUoBQ] Article was created by a [[WP:SPA|single-purpose editor]]. [[User:Dawn Bard|Dawn Bard]] ([[User talk:Dawn Bard|talk]]) 12:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)</small>
-'''Keep''' - I believe that this article's subject matter is notable. There are enough independent sources to deem it so (Although very little, still enough. I think.). And while work does need to be done on this article, I think that the popularity of this person’s videos and appearances on other YouTube personality's videos proves it's notability enough.
+'''Keep''' - I believe that this article's subject matter is notable. There are enough independent sources to deem it so (Although very little, still enough. I think.). And while work does need to be done on this article, I think that the popularity of this person’s videos and appearances on other YouTube personality's videos proves it's notability enough. [[User:Zach Winkler|Zach Winkler]] ([[User talk:Zach Winkler|talk]]) 23:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)