User talk:Lmatt123

Hello, Lmatt123, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 06:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Maryse Selit

Please vote only once in the AFD discussion. You may also want to read WP:SPA and possibly WP:COI. Hairhorn (talk) 15:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

REPLY TO HAIRHORN: I did not vote a second time. I merely responded to the comments made by NJ Wine (are you telling me that only you and NJ Wine are entitled to make multiple comments but, as a new editor, I am not?? Where in the Wiki G/Ls is that stated??) As for your allegations of a single-purpose a/c and potential conflicts of interest, you are absolutely and utterly incorrect. I am not trying to promote this attorney or anyone else for that matter. I contributed to this article and a number of other related articles because they are subjects I am knowledgeable about. I am personally aware of the achievements and notability of this lawyer and, as an attorney myself, have the expertise to make that assessment. I found your comments "about Spammy references" and "the fact that she is just an entertainment lawyer does not cut it" etc. to be in conflict with Wiki guidelines (and I have spent a lot of time reading the G/Ls). I also saw that you removed the pics I uploaded of Katt Williams (which i did at his request) without any explanation. Mr. Williams lived in Watchung and wanted his presence on the east-coast documented b/c be intends to make it a permanent residence, but you arbitrarily decided to remove that pic, because you were "unsure what it was doing there". I have been monitoring your comments and contributions too and I can see how you appear to believe that you more rights than I do just because you are a frequent contributor. Contrarily, you are bound by the same rules that I am and I intend to spend the time to make sure that you do not continue to behave this way towards people and articles you dislike personally (and believe me, I see a clear pattern).

I considered your bolded "keep" a second vote, you can make as many comments as you like, but please don't restate your vote at the beginning of each one. I pointed you towards the SPA page, not simply because your edits are focused on a single subject, but because your image uploads are all related to Maryse Selit ‎and all tagged as your own work, suggesting that you have a connection to this person. Hairhorn (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

I am not disputing that Ms. Selit is a colleague (as already stated, I am personally aware of the achievements of this attorney) but I have also uploaded images of Katt Williams, Snoop Dogg, Katya Kharkova and others. Moreover, I have been neutral and factual in my contributions and there have been no embellishments. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and intend to contribute a great deal more going forward. However, it would be helpful in that regard if more experienced editors offered guidance and advice instead of unnecessarily harsh commentary that does not conform with Wiki etiquette.

In response to your feedback

Could you please tell me more about what happened? I tried looking through your contributions but could not figure it out. :)

Tow Trucker talk 00:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

 

Maryse Selit AfD and Civility

Several of your comments on the Maryse Selit AfD are not in the spirit of Wikipedia. Although I agree with you that the AfD is not an appropriate forum for a person to accuse you of having a single-purpose account, nothing is really gained by engaging in personal attacks against admins who you haven't dealt with: "I have no doubt the administrator will vote in your favor, but it will have nothing to do with your allegations of SPAs. Instead, since you nominated this AfD, it does not matter what the discourse is or how many Keeps you get in favor, you'll make sure to find the right people to support your deletion decision and bully them into going along with you." My experience with admins closing AfD is that they are very fair. Although in a few cases I disagreed with an admin's decision, I have never seen a case where I thought they played favorites. NJ Wine (talk) 03:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

REPLY TO NJ Wine: Thanks for the note. Your insight and guidance is much appreciated.

Reply

I read the AfD regarding Maryse Selit and have voted based on my best judgement. Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and I have tried to judge if the article is a proper fit for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please note that editors on Wikipedia are volunteers and accusing your fellow editors and getting into arguments does not contribute anything and is bad for the community. The final decision on if this article will be included in Wikipedia will be based on the final consensus from the AfD discussion. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia :) --Tow Trucker talk 05:21, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply Tow Trucker Thanks for reviewing the article per my request and voting in your best judgment. While I agree that it behoves no one to get into arguments and accuse one another, I think it is extremely bad for the community when editors (whether volunteers or not) make libelous and pejorative comments about the subjects of articles and falsely accuse contributors of acting in bad faith. Once that is done, I certainly believe that a response is warranted. I have documented numerous accounts of such conduct towards the Wiki community by one editor in particular. And, as a lawyer myself, I genuinely believe this behavior must not be tolerated.

Perhaps this article can be merged. Any suggestions?