Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole: Difference between revisions
→Comments by other users: no evidence presented here of use, let alone abuse, of alternate accounts |
|||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
* This seems to be incorrect. It was [[User:Southend sofa]], not EM who found Mathsci's previous sockpuppet accounts, and the current one, [[User:Aixoise]] seems to be undeclared and of questionable legitimacy. However that issue can and will be resolved at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci]], not here. To suggest that every user who spots one of Mathsci's sockpuppets is themselves a sockpuppet is an interesting tactic but there seems to be no evidence presented here of use, let alone abuse, of alternate accounts. Sadly the same cannot be said for Mathsci. [[User:Jello carotids|Jello carotids]] ([[User talk:Jello carotids|talk]]) 16:34, 26 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 16:34, 26 May 2012
Echigo mole
- Echigo mole (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
26 May 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Leon Gonsalez (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
This sleeping sockpuppet account is a disruption only account trolling on noticeboards in a manner identical to Echigo mole. Like the previous account Krod Mandoon (talk · contribs), blocked by Elen of the Roads, it is a sleeping sockpuppet account, not even autoconfirmed, that was created in May 2009. The long diatribe on WP:AN is a repetition of the familiar trolling rants of previous Echigo mole socks. Mathsci (talk) 07:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
26 May 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
Jello carotids (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
As on previous occasions, Echigo mole has spent his time finding a declared legitimate alternative account used for gathering diffs in an arbcom case. This user made a similar complaint about Alternative-mathsci (talk · contribs). Mathsci (talk) 16:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- This seems to be incorrect. It was User:Southend sofa, not EM who found Mathsci's previous sockpuppet accounts, and the current one, User:Aixoise seems to be undeclared and of questionable legitimacy. However that issue can and will be resolved at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci, not here. To suggest that every user who spots one of Mathsci's sockpuppets is themselves a sockpuppet is an interesting tactic but there seems to be no evidence presented here of use, let alone abuse, of alternate accounts. Sadly the same cannot be said for Mathsci. Jello carotids (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2012 (UTC)