Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Govil: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Sanjay Govil: Relisting debate |
→Sanjay Govil: not a valid rationale |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I don't think that the reason for being notable for an award received 10 years ago. I think the notability factor lies in how fast he grew the business in the small time frame. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alli440|Alli440]] ([[User talk:Alli440|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alli440|contribs]]) 04:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|Alli440}} |
I don't think that the reason for being notable for an award received 10 years ago. I think the notability factor lies in how fast he grew the business in the small time frame. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alli440|Alli440]] ([[User talk:Alli440|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alli440|contribs]]) 04:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|Alli440}} |
||
::That doesn't meet [[WP:BIO]], though. And since the aforementioned award was ostensibly for the same reason, that's why I raised the issue. Still interested in seeing what other folks think. [[User:Thorncrag|<span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;color:black;"><span style="position:absolute;bottom:1px;width:100%;height:8px;background:#eee"> </span><span style="position:relative;border:1px solid #bbb"> Thorncrag </span></span>]] 15:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
||
Revision as of 15:45, 18 June 2012
- Sanjay Govil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't agree that a "lesser" (term used very loosely) award received 10 years ago evidences this person's continual notability. That seems to be the singular assertion of notability. However I am interested in what other folks have to say. Thorncrag 15:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oops - Heh, I moved it back to the AfC space before the AfD was filed (I think we were working on it at the same time...). It was clearly copy-pasted from there. Please ping me if you'd like me to undo my actions. ~ Matthewrbowker Talk to me 21:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I don't think that the reason for being notable for an award received 10 years ago. I think the notability factor lies in how fast he grew the business in the small time frame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alli440 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- That doesn't meet WP:BIO, though. And since the aforementioned award was ostensibly for the same reason, that's why I raised the issue. Still interested in seeing what other folks think. Thorncrag 15:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 04:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)