Jump to content

User talk:Bihco: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lieke2012 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


Just so you know, you haven't provided any explanation of what action you want taken with your RfD nomination of [[Messenger Muhammad PBUH]]. I'm assuming you're advocating deletion, but even that isn't clear, as RfD has numerous possible outcomes. I'd recommend you include some sort of reasoning if you want any action taken on the page.<span class="nowrap">--[[User:Fyre2387|Fyre2387]] <sup>([[User talk:Fyre2387|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fyre2387|contribs]])</sup></span> 21:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Just so you know, you haven't provided any explanation of what action you want taken with your RfD nomination of [[Messenger Muhammad PBUH]]. I'm assuming you're advocating deletion, but even that isn't clear, as RfD has numerous possible outcomes. I'd recommend you include some sort of reasoning if you want any action taken on the page.<span class="nowrap">--[[User:Fyre2387|Fyre2387]] <sup>([[User talk:Fyre2387|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fyre2387|contribs]])</sup></span> 21:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

== YASD (Yet Another Speedy Deletion) ==

I notice that you deleted [[Hallucinations (book)]]. May I ask why? All of Oliver Sacks's books have pages explaining their content, and when Hallucinations is published people will want to know about it.

Wikipedia is already rife with random, senseless deletions, which are driving away contributors. Don't be part of the problem, please.
[[User:Drnathanfurious|Drnathanfurious]] ([[User talk:Drnathanfurious|talk]]) 06:25, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:25, 26 June 2012

Deletion 'David P. Bernstein

Dear Bihco, I just saw that the autobiography article I created today (under the name 'David P. Bernstein') has been proposed for deletion, because it would not contain references to reliable sources. Could you maybe specify what is meant here, since I added various references to peer reviewed books and academic journal articles that directly support the material I included in the article.

Best regards, Lieke2012


Bold textHi Bihco, I hope it's okay to write here. You deleted the article I had created earlier today, Current Swell. I tried to read section A7, but honestly, I still dont know what should have been different on the article for it not to be deleted. All I can say is: that band has 4 studio albums, 45 935 listeners on Lastfm, so they're big enough to be included, I think. (PS: I don't need userfication, I had saved a copy already) Ocilya42 (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, just saw that you didn't delete it, *Malik Shabazz* did. Well. I asked my question here first, so leaving it here now! ^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocilya42 (talkcontribs) 21:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Nudadiha

Hello Bihco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nudadiha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLP removal

Hi, a few minutes ago I helped a helpee in the IRC related to Matthias Zimmermann (artist) and I removed your BLP PROD since it includes a full section of works/references written about him and his works. Regards, mabdul 15:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mauro Covacich

Hi Bihco, I saw you propose Mauro_Covacich (english version) to be deleted, because it appears to have no references. It appears strange to me that the same headword in portuguese, german, and italian hasn't the same problem, but that's it. I changed references in the page using first of all article, reviews, and other wikipedia headwords written in english, so to raise the comprehension and the comparison of what i wrote. Any suggests? THX Ivanmacculi (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


p.s. I 've insered the same message on my talk page. probably it's more correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivanmacculi (talkcontribs) 12:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Isra and Mi'raj and such

May I suggest referencing WP:MOSISLAM or WP:SAWS in the edit summaries? Might (well, maybe on occasion) help prevent reverting. Thanks for the scrub! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Redirects for deletion

Just so you know, you haven't provided any explanation of what action you want taken with your RfD nomination of Messenger Muhammad PBUH. I'm assuming you're advocating deletion, but even that isn't clear, as RfD has numerous possible outcomes. I'd recommend you include some sort of reasoning if you want any action taken on the page.--Fyre2387 (talkcontribs) 21:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YASD (Yet Another Speedy Deletion)

I notice that you deleted Hallucinations (book). May I ask why? All of Oliver Sacks's books have pages explaining their content, and when Hallucinations is published people will want to know about it.

Wikipedia is already rife with random, senseless deletions, which are driving away contributors. Don't be part of the problem, please. Drnathanfurious (talk) 06:25, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]