Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Cases: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:16, 28 June 2012

United States: Government Redirect‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Supreme Court cases NA‑class

	This redirect is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Clarification needed

This article needs more clarity. Folks looking for a description of the SCOTUS decision, like me, are going to be confused. Maybe the links can be annotated? Maybe the lead can describe how they fit together? Or, maybe a single article of all cases? LaTeeDa (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The cases should be merged into one article. While they are legally separate cases, they all pertain to the same general topic, and to a large extent the arguments presented in each case were all presented before the court in NFIB v. Sebelius. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 21:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:40, 28 June 2012 edit LaTeeDa (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 576 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:16, 28 June 2012 edit undo Karimarie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 2,662 edits →‎Clarification needed Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	This article needs more clarity. Folks looking for a description of the SCOTUS decision, like me, are going to be confused. Maybe the links can be annotated? Maybe the lead can describe how they fit together? Or, maybe a single article of all cases? [[User:LaTeeDa\|LaTeeDa]] ([[User talk:LaTeeDa\|talk]]) 19:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)		This article needs more clarity. Folks looking for a description of the SCOTUS decision, like me, are going to be confused. Maybe the links can be annotated? Maybe the lead can describe how they fit together? Or, maybe a single article of all cases? [[User:LaTeeDa\|LaTeeDa]] ([[User talk:LaTeeDa\|talk]]) 19:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
			:The cases should be merged into one article. While they are legally separate cases, they all pertain to the same general topic, and to a large extent the arguments presented in each case were all presented before the court in NFIB v. Sebelius. [[User:Karimarie\|<span style="color: #002BB8; font-weight: bold;">Kari Hazzard</span>]] ([[User_talk:Karimarie\|<span style="color: #002BB8;">T</span>]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Karimarie\|<span style="color: #002BB8;">C</span>]]) 21:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)