Talk:The Phantom: Difference between revisions
Rick Norwood (talk | contribs) |
C'mon, admit it, the Phantom has no personality |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
:I agree with your statement. It seems out of place, stuck on perhaps. I took the liberty of placing that section and the family tree section under the "The character" section. [[User:BostonBay|BayBoy]] 14:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
:I agree with your statement. It seems out of place, stuck on perhaps. I took the liberty of placing that section and the family tree section under the "The character" section. [[User:BostonBay|BayBoy]] 14:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
==C'mon, the Phantom has no personality== |
|||
I had inserted the following paragraph into the article: |
|||
::''The Phantom has always had something of a one-dimensional personality. In contrast, for example, to the [[angst]]-ridden [[Spider-man]], the comic-strip Phantom is never seen upset, doubting his abilities, confused, in despair, or, in general, with a less-than-cheery disposition. He rarely, if ever, makes a mistake. He is occasionally shown angry at evil-doers, the only concession to what might be considered a negative emotion. Moreover, readers never see "the man behind the mask": the Phantom is never seen without either his double-diamond mask or his sunglasses.'' |
|||
Rick Norwood completely reverted this, saying that "The Phantom does get angry and upset when Diana is threatened, and is often seen without mask or sunglasses when with his family.) " I would like to see ''any'' strip where the Phantom is "upset" and I know that I've never ever seen the Phantom without either the mask or the sunglasses. |
|||
At the very least, some mention needs to be made of the Phantom's rather one-dimensional character. |
|||
Your thoughts, folks?? [[User:BostonBay|BayBoy]] 04:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:27, 25 April 2006
Comics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
I've just reverted a large edit by an anonymous user partly because it is unencyclopedic - reading more like an RPG character profile than an encyclopedia entry - but mainly because it is composed largely of uncredited quotations (see [1], [2], [3]), and is therefore problematic from a copyright standpoint (see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations).
--Paul A 04:20, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
The kids
The addition "and after their birth there were several episodes of The Phantom changing diapers and looking for lost toys." keeps getting removed by anonymous users. What's the deal here? // Liftarn
I'm the "anonymous user" (only anonymous because I haven't bothered to register yet). It has been common for people who disapproved of the Phantom's marriage and raising a family to claim that "the Phantom is all about diapers and babies now" in a derogatory way. But the fact is that it is an opinion that is very loosely based on fact. To claim that there are "several episodes of The Phantom changing diapers and looking for lost toys." is simply incorrect. There are some stories where the Phantom's family life is mentioned but rarely, if ever, the basis of an entire episode. //AE (soon-to-be-member?)
- No, not an entre episode, but there were several episodes where the kids played a part, for instance in one episode The Phantom went back to look for a lost toy and saw some bad guys doing something. In another episode his position was revealed because one of the kids started to cry. So it's correct to say that there were "several episodes of The Phantom changing diapers and looking for lost toys", but the episodes weren't entierly about that. // Liftarn
I would agree that on several occasions the Phantom's family life was featured in the strip after the birth of the twins, but not that there were several "episodes of the Phantom changing diapers" (I can think of only one, and that was in a dream sequence) and "looking for lost toys" (you give one example, and that is the only one I can remember too). If you added something about his family life/raising the twins (and not highlighting diapers and toys) aswell as find some other word than "episode" (which can easily be interpreted as the whole episode) it would be more correct. //AE
Episode lists
I removed the episode lists, since they only show a small portion of the early stories, with no comments about later stories. I find no point in including such a list unless it is complete (300+ daily and Sunday stories) or at least make some sort of reference as to why only the very first stories are listed. AEriksson 08:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'll share my thoughts, and let you decide whether to restore the list or not. Ray Moore was the original artist on The Phantom (except for the weeks Lee Falk drew himself) and his stories are arguably the most famous and worth listing (especially the Sky Band stories). I thought I would do the Ray Moore stories, and leave it at that, since a complete list would be too long. I had planned to go back and add the post-war Ray Moore stories, but before I could do that, you deleted the list. Rick Norwood 18:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'm with Andreas here, it's way too little. And there's nothing called "too much" when it comes to Wikipedia. It could be placed in an article of its own, called "List of daily Phantom stories" or something like that… Jon Harald Søby \ no na 16:33, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Fine by me. Here is the list as far as I carried it. Feel free to add to it, move it, or whatever you like. Rick Norwood 21:36, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'd say that it is completely subjective whether Moore's episodes were the most famous and worth listing. IMO, both the McCoy and Barry stories could qualify for this aswell. Listing all stories would be a time-consuming but possibly worthwhile project. On the other hand there are plenty of other sources on the net with complete story lists already. Maybe a link to Deep Woods would be enough until someone finds time to do a complete story list here on wikipedia. AEriksson 10:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Episode Guide
- daily stories
1 | The Singh Brotherhood | Moore | 17 Feb 1936 |
2 | The Sky Band | Moore | 9 Nov 1936 |
3 | The Diamond Hunters | Moore | 12 Apr 1937 |
4 | Little Tommy | Moore | 20 Sep 1937 |
5 | The Prisoner of the Himalayas | Moore | 7 Feb 1938 |
6 | Adventure in Algiers | Moore | 20 Jun 1938 |
7 | The Shark's Nest | Moore | 25 Jul 1938 |
8 | Fishers of Pearls | Moore | 7 Nov 1938 |
9 | The Slave Traders | Moore | 30 Jan 1939 |
10 | The Mysterious Girl | Moore | 8 May 1939 |
11 | The Golden Circle | Moore | 4 Sep 1939 |
12 | The Seahorse | Moore | 22 Jan 1940 |
13 | The Game of Alvar | Moore | 29 Jul 1940 |
14 | Diana Aviatrix | Moore | 16 Dec 1940 |
15 | The Phantom's Treasure | Moore | 14 Jul 1941 |
16 | The Phantom Goes to War | Moore/McCoy | 2 Feb 1942 |
- Sunday stories
1 | The League of Lost Men | Moore | 28 May 1939 |
2 | The Precious Cargo of Colonel Winn | Moore | 22 Oct 1939 |
3 | The Fire Goddess | Moore | 17 Mar 1940 |
4 | The Beachcomber | Moore | 28 Jul 1940 |
5 | The Saboteurs | Moore | 5 Jan 1941 |
6 | The Return of the Sky Band | Moore | 2 Mar 1941 |
7 | The Impostor | Moore | 1 Mar 1942 |
8 | Castle in the Clouds | Moore/McCoy | 18 Oct 1942 |
Message boards
Someone had added the link ipcomic.net which leads to a message board. Am not sure whether it is good enough to be retained. Tintin 13:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
2005 Film
Does anyone know anything about this film? [4]
Family tree
I like the idea of the Family Tree, but it takes too long to load. Either a way must be found so it loads faster, or it needs to be deleted, or at least moved to a page of its own, where people can see it if they are willing to wait for several minutes. Rick Norwood 13:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Source of the tree
I like the idea too but it should definitely be accompanied by a line stating the source of the information and also that it is not a "strictly followed version", as Lee Falk himself wasn't very consistent about the Phantom's vast history. -- Aman King --221.134.26.129 08:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- You'll have to fix it, since I cannot load the article since the "family tree" was added. Rick Norwood 14:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- I love that tree. I am on dial-up with a Windows 98 computer and this page loads no slower than any other, despite all the images. Gotta love those images too. This is certainly one of the better comic strip articles in Wikipedia (although perhaps this has something to do with the "superhero" aspect of it). BayBoy 14:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- I like the family tree, too, and maybe I am just impatient. It takes about a minute to load -- but a minute seems very long when you are waiting. Rick Norwood 14:55, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
The legend
I do not understand the significance of the section "The legend". I feel that either more information should be added or the section removed. -- Aman King --221.134.26.129 08:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with your statement. It seems out of place, stuck on perhaps. I took the liberty of placing that section and the family tree section under the "The character" section. BayBoy 14:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
C'mon, the Phantom has no personality
I had inserted the following paragraph into the article:
- The Phantom has always had something of a one-dimensional personality. In contrast, for example, to the angst-ridden Spider-man, the comic-strip Phantom is never seen upset, doubting his abilities, confused, in despair, or, in general, with a less-than-cheery disposition. He rarely, if ever, makes a mistake. He is occasionally shown angry at evil-doers, the only concession to what might be considered a negative emotion. Moreover, readers never see "the man behind the mask": the Phantom is never seen without either his double-diamond mask or his sunglasses.
Rick Norwood completely reverted this, saying that "The Phantom does get angry and upset when Diana is threatened, and is often seen without mask or sunglasses when with his family.) " I would like to see any strip where the Phantom is "upset" and I know that I've never ever seen the Phantom without either the mask or the sunglasses.
At the very least, some mention needs to be made of the Phantom's rather one-dimensional character.
Your thoughts, folks?? BayBoy 04:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)