Talk:400 kV Thames Crossing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:05, 15 July 2012

Energy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Photo

I will try and get a photo this weekend if I get time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Htmlland (talk • contribs) 18:37 2 October, 2007 (UTC)

This article would definitely benefit from a photo. In the absence of one from Htmlland since his comment last year, are they any volunteers? Rovaniemi-5 (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

So which is it? The title says 380 kV. The article text talks about 400 kV. Astronaut (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all mentions of "400 kV" to read "380 kV" instead. I really don't know which is correct. See WP:BRD. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And how can there be a platform in 670 feet if the towers are 623 feet tall? 85.217.38.115 (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted any mention of the height and just said he fell. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having worked in the Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC)for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section the correct voltage is 400kV. We do not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. Aquizard 14:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 And how can there be a platform in 670 feet if the towers are 623 feet tall? [[Special:Contributions/85.217.38.115|85.217.38.115]] ([[User talk:85.217.38.115|talk]]) 01:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 :I deleted any mention of the height and just said he fell. [[User:TWCarlson|TWCarlson]] ([[User talk:TWCarlson|talk]]) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
+Having worked in the Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC)for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section the correct voltage is 400kV. We do not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. Aquizard 14:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)