Talk:400 kV Thames Crossing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:09, 16 July 2012

Energy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Photo

I will try and get a photo this weekend if I get time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Htmlland (talk • contribs) 18:37 2 October, 2007 (UTC)

This article would definitely benefit from a photo. In the absence of one from Htmlland since his comment last year, are they any volunteers? Rovaniemi-5 (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

So which is it? The title says 380 kV. The article text talks about 400 kV. Astronaut (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all mentions of "400 kV" to read "380 kV" instead. I really don't know which is correct. See WP:BRD. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And how can there be a platform in 670 feet if the towers are 623 feet tall? 85.217.38.115 (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted any mention of the height and just said he fell. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having worked in the UK Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC) for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section of the network, the correct voltage is 400kV. NGC, the operators of the transmission system in the UK does not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. Aquizard (talk) 17:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 And how can there be a platform in 670 feet if the towers are 623 feet tall? [[Special:Contributions/85.217.38.115|85.217.38.115]] ([[User talk:85.217.38.115|talk]]) 01:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 :I deleted any mention of the height and just said he fell. [[User:TWCarlson|TWCarlson]] ([[User talk:TWCarlson|talk]]) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
-Having worked in the Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC) for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section the correct voltage is 400kV. We do not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. Aquizard 15:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)  Aquizard 14:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
+Having worked in the UK Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC) for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section of the network, the correct voltage is 400kV. NGC, the operators of the transmission system in the UK does not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. [[User:Aquizard|Aquizard]] ([[User talk:Aquizard|talk]]) 17:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)