Talk:Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:42, 25 July 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Rajasthan / Education Start‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Blitzschlag MNIT Jaipur was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 02 August 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This needs a lot of contribution. Most of the things are completely broken. The references are out.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{talkpage}} {{WikiProject India|importance=mid|class=start|rajasthan=yes|rajasthan-importance=high|education=yes|education-importance=mid|assess-date=May 2012}}
 {{afd-merged-from|Blitzschlag MNIT Jaipur|Blitzschlag MNIT Jaipur|02 August 2011|date=August 2011}}
+This needs a lot of contribution. Most of the things are completely broken. The references are out.