Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Farquhar: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→[[Brad Farquhar]]: merge by clear precedent |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 16:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 16:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
*We have overwhelming precedent to '''merge''' such candidates, where they are treated; the target here would be [[Conservative Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election]], where Farquahar is at least equally notable to every other candidate listed. [[User:Samaritan|Samaritan]] 03:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC) |
*We have overwhelming precedent to '''merge''' such candidates, where they are treated; the target here would be [[Conservative Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election]], where Farquahar is at least equally notable to every other candidate listed. [[User:Samaritan|Samaritan]] 03:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
**...and look, [[Conservative Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election#Brad Farquhar|he's listed already!]] [[User:Samaritan|Samaritan]] 03:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:52, 28 April 2006
Prodded on grounds that he lost his election bid, deprodded as major party candidate for national office. Per consensus, failed candidates need to have notability other than failed bids for office and this candidate appears marginal in this regard wrt WP:BIO. Eusebeus 12:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete agree. Reads like an excerpt from a campaign brochure. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 12:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. PJM 13:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom--blue520 13:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete; Eusebeus sums it up well. Colonel Tom 13:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet WP:BIO criteria.--Isotope23 15:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. RGTraynor 15:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per the good doctor. —Encephalon 17:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 16:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- We have overwhelming precedent to merge such candidates, where they are treated; the target here would be Conservative Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election, where Farquahar is at least equally notable to every other candidate listed. Samaritan 03:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- ...and look, he's listed already! Samaritan 03:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)