User talk:John D. Rockerduck

Great work

	Saving Wikipedia creates an appetite
	You must be hungry after all of the hard work you're doing. Have a delicious Chick-a-fil sandwhich. – Lionel (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC

Getting help/answering questions

The people at this wikiproject can help if you have any problems or questions. Just post your question at WT:WikiProject Conservatism.

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! – Lionel (talk) 02:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Old conversation

Hi John D. Rockerduck here somebody named Aethersniper started an SPI investigation into me saying I'm Mantion I have not been editing wikipedia that long and the charges are horse feathers should I be worried and is there anything I should do since I have never had to deal with this before here is a link to the SPI

John D. Rockerduck (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 19:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't know that much about SPIs here on Wikipedia, but if you aren't guilty I'd say you don't have too much to be concerned about. Belchfire (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Great news the two administrators who have commented have said a Checkuser is not even necessary, thanks for answering my question by the way. Already I can see being an editor who is willing to call out liberal bias on wikipedia is going to be a chore, keep up the good fight Belchfire I would say if William F. Buckley was alive today he would probably let your write at the National Review as for me I would be lucky if he even let me sweep up the place, your fan John D. Rockerduck (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Ah sheez, don't lay it on thick or anything.  :-) Yeah, it is a chore, but the truth is important. Keep in mind what some famous dude once said: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Or something like that. Belchfire (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Meanwhile, in other news... all 3 IPs (so far) belonging to our angry friend at the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security have been blocked for 72 hours. Now maybe the rest of us can get something done. Dontcha feel better knowing that guys like that are keeping us safe from terrorists? Belchfire (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Another fan here. That officially makes it a club, <grin>. That famous dude who the quote is attributed to is Edmund Burke, most notable for being the patron of WP:WikiProject Conservatism. To a much lesser extent, he is also known as the father of conservatism. – Lionel ^(talk) 23:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Was Jesus a liberal?

Would you describe Jesus as a liberal or conservative? In your response, please cite actual teachings of Jesus. Viriditas (talk) 03:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

I only meant that Still-24 was being anti-catholic though I disagreed with alot of the things you said but I don't view you (Viritadis) as anti-catholic maybe a heretic but then again most U.S. Catholics are, As for Jesus I don't know I would say he would definately be pro-life, and economically liberal I'm not sure about other issues, I really don't want to debate this that is why I left the forum, listen Viriditas you seem pretty learned in the bible you can still be a good catholic without agreeing with everything the church says, I agree with most of it but not quite everything so I'm a heretic too. Please I do not want to debate this anymore It seems to me an excercise in futility were we will just end up disagreeing so I'm am not debating this okay you can have the last word but make that your final edit concerning this because I making this edit mine John D. Rockerduck (talk) 04:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

John, I'm not a Christian, but I appreciate world religions and I've studied them and their history. I wasn't trying to debate anything with you, but rather to understand your perspective. Sometimes asking questions is the best way to do that. May peace be with you. Viriditas (talk) 04:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Conservative members list

Thanks for the invite. I was a member in Dec of 2011 but decided to vacate in late Jan 2012 (I wondered if the Project had grown since I left but couldn't find the list anywhere). I watchlist both Admin Brown and User Still-24 so I have read your correspondence regarding your Faith. You should not have been challenged nor should you feel required to respond (to the above for instance). Enjoy your future editing. ```Buster Seven Talk 04:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks man I appreciate it, By the way once a member always a member you should join back up you sound like a cool editor John D. Rockerduck (talk) 04:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

		The Friendship Barnstar
		Nice to meet you. ```Buster Seven Talk

This is awesome this my first Barnstar ever, hopefully the first of many I won't forget this Buster7 your the man John D. Rockerduck (talk) 04:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

If you have time and the inclination to be of service, check out WP:WER. I'm sure you can find a niche that you would enjoy. ```Buster Seven Talk 04:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

[[Image:Template:LogoCon|right|80px]] Welcome to WikiProject Conservatism! We are a growing community of editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles related to conservatism. Here's how you can get involved: Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it. Check the Recent changes for vandalism and violations of the neutral point of view policy. Add the project banner {{WikiProject Conservatism}} to conservatism-related articles, and assess them as well. Join fellow members in editing our project-wide article collaboration (the current one is Union for a Popular Movement). Cleanup some of the articles listed for cleanup. Check out the to do list and complete some of the tasks. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! - – Sir Lionel, EG(talk) 09:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

John D., I've seen just about every userbox there is, but that Goldwater userbox had me on the floor, LMAO. – Sir Lionel, EG^(talk) 09:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm glad you got a kick out of that, by the way I rather enjoyed reading you first essay, hopefully it won't be your last, but judging by how Still-24 and Viriditas (your fan club) are the only ones voting to get rid your "radical manifesto"; the essay should be fine and enjoyed by many for years to come. Honestly I think if they could they would attempt to censor or delete your talkpage and where would wikipedia be without the irreverant humour of Sir Lionel John D. Rockerduck (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Chick-fil-A

I'm not reporting you, but I do want to point out that you were edit-warring.[1] [2] [3] In the future, please consider sticking to WP:BRD, where you respond to being reverted by discussing the change, not reverting back. Keep in mind that, although you stopped at 3RR, you could still get blocked for edit-warring if you were reported. StillStanding (24/7) (talk) 03:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

the third was not edit-warring it was an a blocked sock, the first perfectly legit as for the second it was not my prefffered version but a slightly altered one that I thought would be more pleasing to the objecting party two edits do not constitite edit warring your being WP: Pointy about this, secondly you could not report since it's not a legit case, and your being hypocritical since you RV Bluemoonlet's compromise edit at least twice if you use such a pointed defination with me you 2RR plenty of times, also no offense man but you seem to be the only constantly criticizing for this stop doing it so much and let others do it I need some space from you I mean it's like were constantly interacting about everything even in this disscussion were you were not invovled this fits under WP: mind your own business since your not an administrator, so please give me some space man because it's starting to annoy me maybe I'm wrong in this but it is annoying me I'm not saying we can't interact were just need to interact a little less because it is too much for me right now John D. Rockerduck (talk) 07:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Interaction ban StillStanding-247

Take 150 of these and call me in the morning

"just need to interact a little less"

It's obvious that interacting with Still is toxic to you. Why put yourself through the misery? user:Guy Macon got a "divorce" from Still and isn't looking back!!! Hahahahahaha!!! I don't see why User:The ed17 wouldn't give you one too. Check this out: [4]. The best part of all--you don't have to pay alimony, hahahahah!!! Just tell Ed that Sir Lionel sent you--I get a referral fee!! Hahahahah!!! – Sir Lionel, EG^(talk) 07:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Lionelt, again I do feel like that sometimes, but I still have respect for Still-24 (even if he can be annoying at times) and I think politeley asking him to stop lecturing me constantly on my userpage even in issues he was not involved he'll get the message and be reasonable and give me some space. Plus I'm still sore at him about the Catholic remarks I love my church and have devoted some much time with it and it is so apart of my identity that his thoughtless and hostile remarks about the church still bother me, I'll get over it but a need a couple of days with definately less interaction to get over it, if he ignores my request then maybe your right, but then again I'm Catholic I can't get divorced oh cruel Irony, me and Still-24 I'm afraid are stuck with eachother in a loveless marriage, Quite the Blasphemous one you are Lionelt (Hahaha!), anyway I think Belchfire certaintly is in need of the prescrbition your offering desperately more than I am John D. Rockerduck (talk) 08:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Pax tecum, brother.– Sir Lionel, EG^(talk) 03:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

As a 50 year old Catholic who teaches catechism and sponsors for confirmation... you need to go back to school with the 5 year olds. Your comments show you know nothing about what the Church teaches.