User talk:Lfcohen

Blocked

You are simply not going to be able to force edits onto the page, no matter how many accounts you create. Whenever you are willing to discuss this rationally and calmly, and defer to consensus, let me know. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

What are you talking about ??? Who the hell are you ??????

Could you please UNBLOCK me right away ?

many accounts ?? What are you talking about ? this is the only account I have for almost 6 to 8 years!

br.linkedin.com/in/leonardocohen

This is an absurd!

Leonardo

lfcohen

Blocked WHY ???

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lfcohen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is outrageous and absolutely ridiculous! Who is this guy named "Floquenbeam" whatever that blocks me AND ACCUSES ME OF USING ACCOUNTS ???? you can check my credentials and who I am here: http://br.linkedin.com/in/leonardocohen and make your own conclusions. If you want more references of who I am, we can play this childish game forever! My disagreements with your erratic behaviour on João Gilberto's page does NOT give you the right to ACCUSE me and BLOCK ME in Wikipedia!

Decline reason:

I won't weigh in on the merits of the sockpuppetry allegations, since your unblock request gives two reasons for denial in and of itself. First, be civil (i.e., lay off the CAPS LOCK key and don't refer to this as "childish") and don't blame other people. Second, linking to a website to prove your identity is no defense to a charge of sockpuppetry. You may well be who you say you are ... it doesn't disprove that you've used other accounts under other names if we believe that's likely. Anyone can open an account and give it whatever name they like. It doesn't matter who you are. If the Pope edited Wikipedia and someone found credible evidence he was using other accounts in violation of policy, we'd block him, too. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request - part 2

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lfcohen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Daniel Case, Dear Wikipedia Admins. First of all, my apologies for the unblock request and the way it was done yesterday. I was upset with the situation and instead of waiting a bit to write without anger, I ended up deciding to write. I was not personal but ended up looking like. I dont have access to the technical evidence used to support my block, so, I have no way to point what might be wrong and led to this. What I can say is that I do use Wikipedia as a registered user since 2006 or around, my edits are all registered since 2008 (dont know why no history exists before) and that can be checked on my contribs page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lfcohen). Of course I am no Wikipedia expert and need to familiarise with the terms and the codes used. So, I went to check the "Sock puppetry" situation and that is really not correct at all. I am sure that an IP analysis and history of edits will show that. I have no affiliation with any other user editing the João Gilberto page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/João_Gilberto) and my last contribution to that page was to correct a new fact. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=João_Gilberto&oldid=510197983) and that was that basically, João Gilberto decided to name the company ShowBras his official and exclusive agent again. That can be verified on João's own web page, that has been modified to direct any requests for bookings and etc to the agent, Showbras. That can be verified here: (http://www.joaogilberto.com) where the link to the page was added.

The contribution that I did was minimal and in no way did interfere with the overall discussion that still goes on on the talk page. My contribution from that talk page was also removed, probably with the assumption that I am another person, and that is not the case at all.

I agree with Daniel Case in that anyone can just try to pretend he or she is someone else, but I do not hide behind any bogus info. My user name reflects my name (LFCOHEN, that stands for Leonardo Forte Cohen) and while I can point to online info that testifies the person that I am, I can also provide other means of verification, like e-mail addresses, social profiles and etc etc.

Anyway, whatever is needed, technically speaking or factually, for you Admins, I will be more that happy to provide and clear up this situation. But please, do not accuse me of sock puppetry, it is a very serious accusation and that leads into someone that is not fully honest and is trying to deceive the system. That is not my case. I am 42 years old and was never the subject of such accusation, either in the real world or online universe.

So, my apologies for the use of all caps writing, aggressive language and offensive comments. There was no need for that.

Thanks for the additional unblock revision and let me know if there is anything else that I can or need to provide as final evidence of not doing any temper with user accounts.

Leonardo

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]], Dear Wikipedia Admins. First of all, my apologies for the unblock request and the way it was done yesterday. I was upset with the situation and instead of waiting a bit to write without anger, I ended up deciding to write. I was not personal but ended up looking like. I dont have access to the technical evidence used to support my block, so, I have no way to point what might be wrong and led to this. What I can say is that I do use Wikipedia as a registered user since 2006 or around, my edits are all registered since 2008 (dont know why no history exists before) and that can be checked on my contribs page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lfcohen). Of course I am no Wikipedia expert and need to familiarise with the terms and the codes used. So, I went to check the "Sock puppetry" situation and that is really not correct at all. I am sure that an IP analysis and history of edits will show that. I have no affiliation with any other user editing the João Gilberto page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/João_Gilberto) and my last contribution to that page was to correct a new fact. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=João_Gilberto&oldid=510197983) and that was that basically, João Gilberto decided to name the company ShowBras his official and exclusive agent again. That can be verified on João's own web page, that has been modified to direct any requests for bookings and etc to the agent, Showbras. That can be verified here: (http://www.joaogilberto.com) where the link to the page was added. The contribution that I did was minimal and in no way did interfere with the overall discussion that still goes on on the talk page. My contribution from that talk page was also removed, probably with the assumption that I am another person, and that is not the case at all. I agree with Daniel Case in that anyone can just try to pretend he or she is someone else, but I do not hide behind any bogus info. My user name reflects my name (LFCOHEN, that stands for Leonardo Forte Cohen) and while I can point to online info that testifies the person that I am, I can also provide other means of verification, like e-mail addresses, social profiles and etc etc. Anyway, whatever is needed, technically speaking or factually, for you Admins, I will be more that happy to provide and clear up this situation. But please, do not accuse me of sock puppetry, it is a very serious accusation and that leads into someone that is not fully honest and is trying to deceive the system. That is not my case. I am 42 years old and was never the subject of such accusation, either in the real world or online universe. So, my apologies for the use of all caps writing, aggressive language and offensive comments. There was no need for that. Thanks for the additional unblock revision and let me know if there is anything else that I can or need to provide as final evidence of not doing any temper with user accounts. Leonardo |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]], Dear Wikipedia Admins. First of all, my apologies for the unblock request and the way it was done yesterday. I was upset with the situation and instead of waiting a bit to write without anger, I ended up deciding to write. I was not personal but ended up looking like. I dont have access to the technical evidence used to support my block, so, I have no way to point what might be wrong and led to this. What I can say is that I do use Wikipedia as a registered user since 2006 or around, my edits are all registered since 2008 (dont know why no history exists before) and that can be checked on my contribs page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lfcohen). Of course I am no Wikipedia expert and need to familiarise with the terms and the codes used. So, I went to check the "Sock puppetry" situation and that is really not correct at all. I am sure that an IP analysis and history of edits will show that. I have no affiliation with any other user editing the João Gilberto page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/João_Gilberto) and my last contribution to that page was to correct a new fact. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=João_Gilberto&oldid=510197983) and that was that basically, João Gilberto decided to name the company ShowBras his official and exclusive agent again. That can be verified on João's own web page, that has been modified to direct any requests for bookings and etc to the agent, Showbras. That can be verified here: (http://www.joaogilberto.com) where the link to the page was added. The contribution that I did was minimal and in no way did interfere with the overall discussion that still goes on on the talk page. My contribution from that talk page was also removed, probably with the assumption that I am another person, and that is not the case at all. I agree with Daniel Case in that anyone can just try to pretend he or she is someone else, but I do not hide behind any bogus info. My user name reflects my name (LFCOHEN, that stands for Leonardo Forte Cohen) and while I can point to online info that testifies the person that I am, I can also provide other means of verification, like e-mail addresses, social profiles and etc etc. Anyway, whatever is needed, technically speaking or factually, for you Admins, I will be more that happy to provide and clear up this situation. But please, do not accuse me of sock puppetry, it is a very serious accusation and that leads into someone that is not fully honest and is trying to deceive the system. That is not my case. I am 42 years old and was never the subject of such accusation, either in the real world or online universe. So, my apologies for the use of all caps writing, aggressive language and offensive comments. There was no need for that. Thanks for the additional unblock revision and let me know if there is anything else that I can or need to provide as final evidence of not doing any temper with user accounts. Leonardo |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]], Dear Wikipedia Admins. First of all, my apologies for the unblock request and the way it was done yesterday. I was upset with the situation and instead of waiting a bit to write without anger, I ended up deciding to write. I was not personal but ended up looking like. I dont have access to the technical evidence used to support my block, so, I have no way to point what might be wrong and led to this. What I can say is that I do use Wikipedia as a registered user since 2006 or around, my edits are all registered since 2008 (dont know why no history exists before) and that can be checked on my contribs page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lfcohen). Of course I am no Wikipedia expert and need to familiarise with the terms and the codes used. So, I went to check the "Sock puppetry" situation and that is really not correct at all. I am sure that an IP analysis and history of edits will show that. I have no affiliation with any other user editing the João Gilberto page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/João_Gilberto) and my last contribution to that page was to correct a new fact. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=João_Gilberto&oldid=510197983) and that was that basically, João Gilberto decided to name the company ShowBras his official and exclusive agent again. That can be verified on João's own web page, that has been modified to direct any requests for bookings and etc to the agent, Showbras. That can be verified here: (http://www.joaogilberto.com) where the link to the page was added. The contribution that I did was minimal and in no way did interfere with the overall discussion that still goes on on the talk page. My contribution from that talk page was also removed, probably with the assumption that I am another person, and that is not the case at all. I agree with Daniel Case in that anyone can just try to pretend he or she is someone else, but I do not hide behind any bogus info. My user name reflects my name (LFCOHEN, that stands for Leonardo Forte Cohen) and while I can point to online info that testifies the person that I am, I can also provide other means of verification, like e-mail addresses, social profiles and etc etc. Anyway, whatever is needed, technically speaking or factually, for you Admins, I will be more that happy to provide and clear up this situation. But please, do not accuse me of sock puppetry, it is a very serious accusation and that leads into someone that is not fully honest and is trying to deceive the system. That is not my case. I am 42 years old and was never the subject of such accusation, either in the real world or online universe. So, my apologies for the use of all caps writing, aggressive language and offensive comments. There was no need for that. Thanks for the additional unblock revision and let me know if there is anything else that I can or need to provide as final evidence of not doing any temper with user accounts. Leonardo |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}