User talk:Altetendekrabbe: Difference between revisions
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==unblock request== |
==unblock request== |
||
{{unblock | reason=i have been blocked on completely wrong grounds by administrator mastcell who was solicited by a disruptive editor |
{{unblock | reason=i have been blocked on completely wrong grounds by administrator mastcell who was solicited by a disruptive editor. i have broken no rules nor any pledges. i haven't violated any of my previous unblock conditions. however, i would like to add further new conditions on myself: i promise that i will never personalize disputes again. ever. i also promise to go on a wikibreak for couple of months. i was about to retire from wikipedia but this block is not fair, and i would like to retire in a peaceful manner with no hard feelings to anyone. please, consider my plea. <small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">[[User:Altetendekrabbe|<font style="color:white;background:red;font-family:sans-serif;">''' altetendekrabbe '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 06:46, 25 September 2012
Restriction | Enacted | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|
You will hold yourself to WP:1RR on all articles. | Jul 20, 2012 [1] | Reviewable as of Jan 20, 2013 | Accepted unblock condition |
You will disengage and attempt problem resolution through WP:DR, WP:ANI or other related noticeboards | Jul 20, 2012 [2] | Never | Accepted unblock condition |
Recent edits
This is inappropriate, and probably a violation of your unblock conditions, which include a pledge to avoid personalizing disputes and instead use appropriate dispute-resolution pathways. You're also treading fairly close to the edge of your 1RR restriction at Eurabia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). I'm not going to take action at this point, other than to remind you of the pledges you made. But I'd like to see something other than just technical compliance with the 1RR - like an actual commitment to try to reach consensus through civil discussion rather than edit-warring and personalized rhetoric. If those aren't forthcoming, then you're likely to end up re-blocked. MastCell Talk 18:22, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- er, right. you're now protecting an edit warrior who is in conflict with several editors on islam related articles, and he *uses* you to get his revenge. sorry, you have a very weak case.-- altetendekrabbe 21:04, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Whether or not he's edit-warring, you are responsible for living up to the pledges you made when you were unblocked. If you can't or won't do that, then you'll end up re-blocked. If you choose to view this as him getting "revenge" on you, then the best response is still to honor your commitments and thus deprive him of his revenge. Frankly, though, the escalating personalization in your remarks, and the externalization of all responsibility, is discouraging. MastCell Talk 21:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- you're here because of him. period.-- altetendekrabbe 21:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm here because he left a note on my talkpage which led me to review your recent edits. So yes, I'm "here because of him". Do you believe that absolves you of your responsibility to live up to your commitments? MastCell Talk 21:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- you're here because of him. period.-- altetendekrabbe 21:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- if you had pure intentions you would have warned him as well, but you failed your responsibility. now, stay away from my talk page please.-- altetendekrabbe 21:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Based on your responses here, I have no confidence that you are willing or able to live up to the pledges you made as conditions of your unblock. I'm reinstating your block, indefinitely, in light of your extensive block log and failure to abide by the conditions under which you were unblocked. Your responses here - which involve personalizing the dispute further and externalizing all responsibility for your behavior - also contribute, as they leave me with no confidence that your behavior will improve. You may appeal by using the {{unblock}} template, or by the usual means described here. MastCell Talk 21:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
unblock request
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Altetendekrabbe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i have been blocked on completely wrong grounds by administrator mastcell who was solicited by a disruptive editor. i have broken no rules nor any pledges. i haven't violated any of my previous unblock conditions. however, i would like to add further new conditions on myself: i promise that i will never personalize disputes again. ever. i also promise to go on a wikibreak for couple of months. i was about to retire from wikipedia but this block is not fair, and i would like to retire in a peaceful manner with no hard feelings to anyone. please, consider my plea. <small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">[[User:Altetendekrabbe|<font style="color:white;background:red;font-family:sans-serif;">''' altetendekrabbe '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=i have been blocked on completely wrong grounds by administrator mastcell who was solicited by a disruptive editor. i have broken no rules nor any pledges. i haven't violated any of my previous unblock conditions. however, i would like to add further new conditions on myself: i promise that i will never personalize disputes again. ever. i also promise to go on a wikibreak for couple of months. i was about to retire from wikipedia but this block is not fair, and i would like to retire in a peaceful manner with no hard feelings to anyone. please, consider my plea. <small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">[[User:Altetendekrabbe|<font style="color:white;background:red;font-family:sans-serif;">''' altetendekrabbe '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=i have been blocked on completely wrong grounds by administrator mastcell who was solicited by a disruptive editor. i have broken no rules nor any pledges. i haven't violated any of my previous unblock conditions. however, i would like to add further new conditions on myself: i promise that i will never personalize disputes again. ever. i also promise to go on a wikibreak for couple of months. i was about to retire from wikipedia but this block is not fair, and i would like to retire in a peaceful manner with no hard feelings to anyone. please, consider my plea. <small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">[[User:Altetendekrabbe|<font style="color:white;background:red;font-family:sans-serif;">''' altetendekrabbe '''</font>]]</span></small> 05:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}