Talk:Comparison of issue-tracking systems: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:47, 10 October 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comparison of issue-tracking systems article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Computing: Software Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Meaning of table headings

It's not clear what some of the headings on the tables mean - there needs to be a legend or some explanation. For example, what does GUI imply? Almost all issue tracking software has a GUI but are we talking about a native Windows GUI? Or administration GUI? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factyou (talk • contribs) 17:12, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mantis supports LDAP

FYI, the Mantis Bug Tracker supports LDAP authentication. That's how my site uses it. Configuration is done via the config_inc.php file. Ours does LDAP lookups against a Netware server.

See LDAP for more information.

Include Open-source "Bug Genie"

Include mature, open-source issue-tracking system http://www.thebuggenie.com/ . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.158.120.126 (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only products with articles are included. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If "only products with articles" is a criteria for being included in the list (who made that decision?), then this criteria should appear in the article. Dan Aquinas (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason NOT to include the BugGenie. If someone were reviewing this article to help make a decision then they would completely miss it simply because the product doesn't have a Wikipedia article. I think the excuse of "only products with articles" is a poor one.

Team Foundation Server is not a bug tracker

See Team Foundation Server. It is a source control system, with some feature for project tracking, but is not a "bug tracking system" per se. If you leave it included, the question of "does it integrate with source control" is strange, because it *is* one.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 : Only products with articles are included. --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 02:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 :: If "only products with articles" is a criteria for being included in the list (who made that decision?), then this criteria should appear in the article. [[User:Dan Aquinas|Dan Aquinas]] ([[User talk:Dan Aquinas|talk]]) 16:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
+I see no reason NOT to include the BugGenie. If someone were reviewing this article to help make a decision then they would completely miss it simply because the product doesn't have a Wikipedia article. I think the excuse of "only products with articles" is a poor one.
 == Team Foundation Server is not a bug tracker ==