Talk:Maattrraan

it is semi protected, add tamil wiki link [[ta:மாற்றான் (திரைப்படம்)]] ta:மாற்றான் (திரைப்படம்) --Kurumban (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Full protection

Due to the massive, unceasing edit warring going on here, I've fully protected the article for 1 week. Please use this time to talk about what changes should be made to the article here, on this talk page. Please note that my protection of the current version is in no way an endorsement of the current version; it's just me stopping the edit warring. Please note that if edit warring resumes after the protection expires, I'll either re-protect or block as needed. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Let me be more clear: I said, have a discussion. Not put vandalism crap or put accusations against other editors. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Since this article is protected such that only admins can edit, I'd like users to add info abt the film from these sources:

http://www.rediff.com/movies/report/south-suriya-to-play-conjoined-twins-in-maattrraan/20120713.htm http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/brothers-welcomed-maattrraan-banned-karnataka-100359.html http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/maattrraan-beats-billa-2-box-office-100365.html http://truthdive.com/2012/10/16/box-office-collection-maattrraan-maatran-brothers-collect-27-75-cr-on-opening-weekend.html http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/oct-12-02/maattrraan-suriya-14-10-12.html

Sincerely, Kailash29792 (talk) 10:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 16 October 2012

The review part of film stated that it has received highly negative reviews but the truth is that it has got mixed to positive reviews. It had stated that OneIndia gave it 2.5 but the truth is that the website gave it gave 3.5 there link for my statement on exit link section. One more thing, the movie had been trimmed and add a few scene in second half to up its pace as a few felt second half is draggy. I hope admin will have a look these facts.Your work is hounered by every1. Waxman123456 (talk) 04:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

I also agree with you. The movie has received mixed to positive reviews. But OneIndia rated it 3/5, actually. Add the reviews from NowRunning [1] and don't avoid it saying that the website is not reliable. You have added reviews from MovieCrow, IndianDragon etc. So, add it. Add box office section also. This might help - [2]. Thanks! Josephjames.me (talk) 09:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Please obtain a consensus on these changes before using the edit request template. Once you have a consensus (or, in a few days, if no one else responds) feel free to change the "answered" parameter back to no. Note that admins don't actually make decisions in these matters--all we do is edit based on the consensus of involved editors. However, as for Josephjames.me's comment we can't ignore WP:RS--that site sure doesn't look like it's reliable, so it can't be added.

Finally, while I'm not actually going to debate the content, please note that it is not appropriate to list every single review you can find. We're an encyclopedia, not a review aggregator. We should have a broad summary of the reviews, with specific information picked out from a few that are particularly noteworthy. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

The movie really got Mixed to positive response from critics. but you stated as negative review.please check the sites correctly again and see the reviews and ratings for the movie.and movie is actually doing well in box office.please correct those mistakes. thank you